Articles > Spiritweb
1997 - Week 34
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 97 10:22:31 -0400
Subject: Michael Line 2-11
Michael Line 2-11
(Michael is a causal entity composed of 1050
It seems that the passage of what you perceive as time has given the
channel an opportunity to again move into one of the many directions that
we offer. As we have said in the past, connection with us does not limit
the type or kind of information that a channel receives; whether you are
interested in herbal medicine, ancient religions or Pleiadian beam ships
we will help you access from the collective
akashic record that
information which you seek. However, the main body of our teaching is the
overleaf personality system which we will refer to when necessary. As an
entity this is our primary contribution to aid you in your ascension
process. If you are new to the overleaves we recommend that you make a
request to know more. By doing so you will be led in the right direction.
To briefly summarize the basics of our teaching, the
overleaves are the
energetic shells that drive what you call personality. There are seven
categories as follows: role, goal, attitude, mode, chief feature, center,
and body type. Each categorie has seven types, for example, there are
An overleaf set can look something like this:
Center: Moving, Emotional part
Body type: Lunar
Chief Feature: Greed, secondary Martrydom
(The above set belongs to a 5th level, baby soul, Alabama Highway
Or another set can look like this:
Role: Server; Goal:
Center: Emotional intellectual part; Body type: Jupiter/ Venus; Chief
Arrogance. (This set belongs to a 2nd level, young soul, dentist
in Ankara, Turkey)
(Channeler's note - I am getting a 'Michael Nudge' that these folk really
Also, The University of California at Davis has 30 fragments with the
following overleaf set:
Role: Scholar; Goal: Flow; Mode: Observation; Attitude: Pragmatist;
Center: Intellectual, moving part; Various
We have many excellent
channels who have done well in categorizing and
organizing the overleaves in an understandable way.
Our greater purpose is to help all of humanity move through the
transition that is popularly called the ascension. No, the ascension does
not mean that you will be taken up in space ships, not unless you really
want to. We do not put extra terrestrial contact out of the realm of the
reality that you create for yourselves. If you need to travel into space
to realize who you are then it can be arranged. The Universe is unlimited
in its possibilities of what it can be and beings with the ability to
travel from star system to star system are not beyond the common range of
possibilities and are more common than popularly portrayed. Humanity will
come more and more in realizing this possibility of inter stellar contact
within the span of a generation - if it so chooses to take advantage of
it. We will say that human kind has received the necessary construction
of thought to make it so. The thought simply says, "this is possible, if
you think it enough you will apply your creative powers to its
Many of you have noticed how the stories of extra terrestrial races have
gained acceptance by the popular media. We will neither deny no confirm
that there is a deliberate plot to feed the public with ET information to
soften them for a big announcement. We do not want to encourage too much
fascination with stories of conspiracy, but we do want you to be aware of
the manipulation of information that takes place within the media.
Media, in all its forms is more a reflection of chief feature than it is
of your truth. The media is supported by your fears. However beneath the
hyperbole and melodrama of the media's messages, lies a higher level
agenda of essence that is saying, "look at the possibilities of what you
can be, you are not an isolated, limited being on a small rock of a
planet in a cold, dark Universe." This message, which relates to the
increased awareness of possible extra terrestrial life, can be included
among the many messages that essence is bringing to you to guide you
through the ascension process.
Essence is by far creative in it's nature. We will say its most basic
reward is its opportunity to individualize itself, make choice and be a
participant in creating the universe. What we have to say here is
important - essence must move. It cannot remain static. Essence will not
stay still for you. The ascension is a doorway for essence to become more
of you and if you are not opening your doorway then it may be forced open
for you. We will say here, in no uncertain terms, that the expansion of
the universe is the creative drive of essence. You cannot resist, for
very long that is.
Your energy is dynamic; your doors are opening and it may or may not be a
rough ride depending on your acceptance of it. In the next issue we will
offer you some tips to make this acceptance somewhat easier. We can also
call these tips an ascension mind frame. Most of you of course have
already established a system for navigating the ascension. You have
developed affirmations, meditations, rituals, prayers, and beliefs that
are now helping body and personality channel the energy of essence. You
may however find some amusement in comparing the following with your own.
Next issue: Ascension tips
Kenneth Broom wrote: > This is one of the
heaviest lessons my entity mates kept warning > about. > They said
"Do not linger in the negative pole of the observation > mode."
> Don't let life live you. You "live" life. This turned out to be
the > most > important lesson of my life. To proactively design and create
your > life > keeps you from having to correct so many unintended
Good point. Some mystics claim that in an
"enlightened state" one should remain "active but
undirected" so that the universe/absolute/Tao can direct you, and that one
should become "free of desire." I heard a tape recently of JP VanHulle
channeling Michael that said, to wit, that
Old Souls are always worrying about
"getting it wrong." Michael through JP said that the whole point is to
(I'm heavily paraphrasing), keep moving, stay in the game, IOW. This reminds me
of the beginning of Peck's Road Less Traveled, something about "Who ever
said life was supposed to be without problems?" What I love about writing
fiction (my "calling," if you will) is that it is teaching me so much
about the karma game. There is no plot, no story, without conflict.
Dear Kenneth, You really do feel like a brother :-).
We probably could speak telepathically to each other, that's how familiar it
feels like talking to you.
Kenneth Broom wrote: > Also part of being an old scholar. Now, notice the
nature of the doors > > that are beginning to be opened to you. Notice the
question askers. > and > their agenda. Are they asking you questions that
you haven't yet > asked? > The members of the lists here that I am a
member of are very helpful > in > posing questions that I did not know
that I already knew the answers > to. > An inquisitory method of teaching
and learning rather than an > expository > method. You are absolutely
right! My pleasure in talking to other seekers on the path is mainly for this
reason. They word their questions differently than me and make me see even more
facettes of any given situation as well as inspire me to ask different questions
and make links where I didn't before. > > > And... and... try blessing
and teaching and counseling your other > selves > in your other
incarnations. I think they would appreciate it. >
Thank you for reminding me of this. I haven't thought of it in a few years. I
have absorbed a few other incarnations of mine during my crisis about 3-6 years
ago, including one parallel lifetime of my present self which fragmented and
took another path than the rest of me in my early twenties. I guess it took me
all these years to digest what I had absorbed. But now, it seems like I could do
some more of that. Thanks again, Kenneth, and bless you.
Subject: emotions, feeling, and overleaves...
Hi Aida and everyone,
You asked for some input from other roles. A
bit belatedly here.....I'm an artisan, true with a lot of scholar influences,
but I definitely input from many levels. Sometimes it takes me longer to
consider what it is I really want to share or to sort out all of what I'm
feeling or taking in....even though the initial input through feelings is pretty
Interestingly, my use of the
seems to reflect my roles. I feel first and then process it through the
intellect. To me the feeling/sensing corresponds with my artisan nature and the
way that I sort it afterwards, corresponds to my scholar nature.
A while ago, there was a lot of discussion
about emotions, some of the exchanges seemed even to have stirred up some
emotions. I know I felt a lot about all the exchanges too. There was a lot
reflecting internal battles, I think, and the depression mentioned, more than
Some of what I sensed/felt about issues that
I really sense a difference between feelings
and emotions. Through the way something "feels" I intuit a lot of
information often with very subtle differentiations. Emotional states seem
different from this feeling into the nature of something. It may just be a
difference of degree, but it seems like more than that. I think that is what a
lot of the classic traditions are referring to when they talk of letting the
emotions come to rest or quieting the mind. There's a whole different way of
just knowing when the mind is calm and a way of feeling/intuiting/sensing when
the emotions calm.
Like doorways into different states of being or
consciousness. As with so many insights, they are often used at some point like
a battering ram, rather than just an awareness. Letting emotions come to rest
isn't about stuffing them down, just what can happen when they are calm. My
mother and sister both died this year and truely feeling all that brought up was
amazingly deep, powerful and in the end, freeing. At the same time, I can
recognize how intense emotions influenced my clarity on everything and aren't an
excuse for imposing behavior on others.
When the mind is full of chatter, it blocks our
ability to simply know. It's part of our truest nature to be able to simply know
about something when we focus on it and are quiet inside enough to be
Appreciate all the sharing about depression.
Somewhere I remember it being called the only true old soul disease. What others
have said, lack of appreciation, being so out of step with our culture and
perhaps feeling, as a result, that we are not as true to ourselves as we could
be with all the feelings that causes us to have about ourselves. As well as
often taking longer to pull together all we have going for us, or interact with
the society in a way that keeps the basics going with some ease, without that
feeling of selling ourselves out. There's a lot to balance and come to terms
with, often without much support or understanding, until we find others like
us.... which is a joy.
Also through all the sharing here, have come to
appreciate more how all the different attitudes we bring here, tend to have a
balancing effect. We tend to think of our overleaves as givens to some degree,
but wasn't there something said somewhere about eventually being able to have
freer access to all the overleaves and be able to use them when we choose, in
situations that call for them? Maybe the given overleaves are just tendencies,
sometimes to balance excesses of the past, sometimes just preferences of ways we
approach things....when some of the attitudes are left out of the mix,
internally or externally, the result seems to get sort of skewed. Makes our
blind spots clear to hear from others bringing in the focus of a particular
attitude different from our own. And sure stirs things up sometimes!
Love to all, Brin
Subject: Michael & illness
What are Michael's views on illness?
I have a friend who is currently suffering from
"fibra myalgia" which is a disorder that affects the muscles, causing
chronic discomfort and sometimes severe pain. My friend is a warm, caring
individual who does a tremendous amount of good for others, and it bothers me
that she suffers so with this personal demon. Out of curiosity, I've been
experimenting with automatic writing and tried to get some answers on this
topic. I received the following replies to my questions. What I'm wondering is
do these replies sound like they represent accepted metaphysical truths, or was
I receiving bogus information? Any Michael insights would be appreciated as well
on this subject.
Dave : What is my friend learning from her
Answer: She is discovering new areas in which
to explore her creative impulses. She literally creates her illness with the
wave of a magician's wand. She is solely responsible for her experiences, and
can renege on their manifestations at any time, but she is unaware of this. Her
illness will demonstrate to her that she is the sole proprietor of her
affliction, and when she no longer desires to entertain such a game, her unruly
tenant will seek shelter elsewhere.
Dave: Does she have past emotions that play a
part in her current condition?
Answer: Yes. Emotions are creative in
themselves. They are the building blocks of reality, and if used recklessly,
they can result in a weakness in the infrastructure. Care must be taken to
ensure that these building blocks create a structure that reflects the building
in which we wish to reside.
That's great the channeling you did for your friend. I also have a friend who
has fibromyalgia. She's another scholar/artisan like me and she and I have had
or do have almost all the same physical problems this life, it's rather
strange--but I do not have fibromyalgia, but some back problems which show me
where I still need some emotional healing. Your channeling sounds pretty
accurate to me. It's just that stopping the "game" isn't always as
easy as just choosing to stop--because the lesson isn't gotten. That's why it
keeps coming back.
| \|/ . Lori Tostado ---o--- Lorazz@CRL.com /|\ | . http://members.spiritweb.org/michael-teachings/
The Michael Teachings
I read your post with great interest. Could you please explain to a scholar how
it feels to "input from many levels"? Does that mean you receive
information from those levels which we know as spiritual, mental, emotional and
physical, or are these some Michael-specific levels? And what would that mean
for a scholar who "inputs from one level" only?
Subject: Troy Tolley's First Post
Hey to all of you out there...
I'm new to this forum and I hope my post gets there. I just wanted to introduce
myself. I'm an EAST COAST Michael channel, all alone over here but a few (I see
a lot of Shepherd groupies).
My name's TROY, but you can call me OTTERLY. I've been channeling MIchael for
about ten years and have been pretty much the blacksheep of the clan since I
started so young and din't really pay much attention to the business aspects of
it. All clients have come through word of mouth over the years. When I cam to
NEW YORK and was exposed to Shepherd's channeling I was a little thrown since I
had never really been exposed to the "politics" inherent in "the
business" and his channeling style was (and still is!) extremely foreign to
what I know as channeling from the other Michael channels. So I kind of laid low
and went with that I knew as Michael. Maybe some of you remember me from
standing in for Shepherd at one point while he was away...I was a fledgling.!
..what a fiasco? I know I remember ED... And I remember SETH COHN (SP?). I urged
Shepherd to introduce me to SETH at one time (I only knew you through your
transcriptions) because I felt a resonance, but Shepherd dissuaded that,...
maybe now it's OK. I've been watching the post s for a while and see a lot of
religious talk and heirarchial debates; is this common? I haven't seen much
Michael stuff in fact. Well, I 'll keep peeking. ALso, If any of you have any
questions you'd like posed to MIchael through me, I'd be happy to respond! I'm
going to RALEIGH, for work for a while (that's where I origianlly blossomed--THanks
in WHOLE to HOLLY COLEMAN!!!). Here are my overleaves for those interested per
HOLLY COLEMAN all those years ago (by the way, she's an excellent channel and
person!!! SO is Ted FONTAINE!!) 6th OLD SAGE/ARTISAN, Cadre1/Entity2 (Michael's
system, not Sheperd's), Acceptance/Passion/Idealist/Selfdep/ARROGANCE/Emotional/int.
part/VENUS... I look forward to! hearing from you all and interacting.
be loved... otterly
Subject: re: cadre numbers
Barbara, that's a simple and clear explanation of how the cadre numbering
began...and why so many of us are in cadre one. Then my understanding is
Shepherd began getting information (and meeting a few) from entities older than
cadre one, causing him to renumber cadre one to cadre three, with his new one
and two currently mostly incarnate in the Orient. I know it causes people a lot
of confusion. I think the additional information through Shepherd has been
interesting. Would be fascinating to know about cadres that have come before us.
When I am drawn to moments in history am I simply being drawn to the resonances
of what someone in my cadre or entity did and feel the pull or a more profound
impact because of it?
As for the entity numbering though, I thought the entity numbers within each
cadre had a greater significance than just who showed up first, (although the
nature of some of the early numbered, cardinal fragments within those entities
does include boldness and getting out and doing it first perhaps in their
I really enjoy hearing about
cadre and entity numbers. I'm in cadre one,
entity four (cadre three by Shepherd).
Michael talks about artisans having to do with structure. In a lot of ways that
information threw me, because I love free form and freedom of movement for the
flexibility to pull in from lots of sources to create. Then I recently
understood some of what was meant by artisans relationship with structure (other
than the structure involved in any new creation--maybe it's just so close, it's
like the air I breathe). I continually am drawn to notice the structural
interrelationships between people, things, and so on, like an on going awareness
of the weave of the fabric of which we're all apart, the different colors of
threads running through cadences and entities and cadres, both within and
between and I'm sure in all the multidimensional ways we're willing or able to
become aware of. This is especially true as I meet (in person especially) and
interact with more people in our cadre. I can feel the resonances, the strains
of similarities that run through us. Really enjoy feeling this weave of the
fabric. Yes, I've heard and I deeply know we are all one, but its a pleasure to
see how it carries through in so many ways. That we're never really alone, and
could never be.
Recently met someone else in entity four. She's a priest. In spite of the
different roles, it was fascinating how much was similar in our core outlook,
experience and interests. It seemed like a lot of our core challenges were very
similar too. It was the strangest feeling being together, like looking in a
mirror. We both felt it. There was also a powerful electrical resonance. And
while physically we look somewhat different, in some deeper way there's a lot
even physically that is the same. So hard to put it into words. (Maybe we are in
the same cadence or a near cadence or ....(?), cause I'm not sure the
similarities are always this strong.) We don't have much way to acknowledge all
this except maybe just to feel it and to know. But it gave me a powerful sense
of having others working together with me on the deepest parts of life. Like a
solid reverberation of the closeness of my entity and the entities in our cadre
and the way it ripples out and is profoundly intertwined. -------
Lori, really enjoyed the information you put up on the web page about the
positive and negative poles of different emotional states and what we can do not
to get stuck....thanks.
Best to all, Brin
Danielle, working on an answer for you.... :)
Subject: artisan multi-input
You asked what it feels like for an artisan to imput from many levels. Wouldn't
be surprised if there's a lot of fluidity in this, so I'll just share my
experience and perceptions of how it feels for me.... (My guess is it might vary
with centering and how much essence is being accessed among other things.)
As I go through the day, I'm aware of the near environment....(Michael talks
about the artisans aura being very diffuse. So I actually feel into what is
close by and what is coming up.) Within that I'm aware of the consciousness
(like the life force glowing out) of everything around me, the intent, both in
terms of probability and also the highest potential I am aware of (how I might
choose to interact with all of it). So, for instance, I might feel sense the
life force/light first of a kitty mostly hidden behind something across the
street and feel the intent that it's about to dart in front of my car so that I
can change my path or stop or slow down or whatever to harmonize with the
environment. When there's not some active need to respond quickly like that,
which actually is pretty rare, I might simultaneously be aware of intuitions or
knowings about what's taking place, or even that someone I love has stopped to
think of me, perhaps far away.
So what's happening (both near environment and a sense of the what's going on in
the world too), the probable outcomes (what would currently happen if everything
kept moving the same way), the highest possibilities (what could happen with a
little tweaking or more love or whatever), an ongoing sense of harmonizing
(which could just be part of my focus in the menu of things that can be
created), and knowings and intuitions.
When creating something, maybe it's the awareness of all the pieces and their
innate natures, the way they have been put together or not before, how they
could go together, the current relationship between all the aspects, and the new
creation aimed for.
When reading, it might be the actual words and their meanings, the true intent
of the words, maybe even the feelings implicit in the words, other related works
and where the quotes are that relate (both the placement in the book and where
the book is or could be found)....Have a friend that is a priest essence who
does body work who remembers movements the way I remember feeling imprints. It's
fun when we share memories of the same event to get such a different slant on
it, often coming to the same sense of the meaning of the experience, just
through different means.
To a scholar, it might seem like an artisan is unfocused, when really we're just
noticing many things simultaneously and how they interrelate and can form new
creations. I wonder if artisans often play a kind of peace maker role because of
this? (Maybe just because our energy field is diffuse and a lot of things take
place within it that we feel directly.) A scholar would probably just choose to
focus on each input one at a time. (As a scholar friend said to me and an
artisan friend talking the other day, "Can't you just talk about one thing
at a time?" I think we thought we were....
I can't really say that it corresponds with spiritual, mental, emotional and
physical levels and so on, but maybe it can. In Shepherd's Journeys book, Ed was
quoted as suggesting that the five inputs correspond with current reality, the
state of the work in progress, the muse or vision of what is to be created,
random unconscious stimulation that allows for creativity and the application of
the imagination, "What would happen if I try this here?" I think
there's probably a lot of truth in this when the focus is a creative act.
However, I think the random unconscious stimulation is more conscious than
unconscious, which creates all the tracks to begin with....
Would love to hear other artisan's experiences here.
Gosh, I thought this would be easier to explain. It may just sound confusing,
but it doesn't feel that way inside. It's sort of like the difference between
something being more diffuse or more focused to begin with. Even within the
diffusion there can be clarity and a different kind of focus. This is from
someone who also has high female energy (65 to 70%) and about mid range
frequency (55 or so).
Best to all,
Subject: Just a pondering question...
To the members of the list I would like to ask a question. I'm a very new
student to the Michael Teachings having only become aware (at least in this
reality) a little over two years ago. I was introduced through the Yarbro books
and when I started reading them I wasn't really sure what it was that I WAS
reading. When I realized that what I was reading wasn't a fictional story I felt
a physical sensation of an enormous weight being lifted off of me. I can still
remember the moment. There was no question in my mind but that I had found a way
of looking at life that I could wear (I like the analogy of putting things on a
seeing how they feel to me) very comfortably.
Now the question. The Michael Teachings have been around now for around 27
years. I am just curious why there aren't droves of people reading and studying
this material? Is there a reason why these teachings haven't become more open in
the public? I do realize that the human pool of folks who might be interested is
depleted by all those infant, baby and young souls not looking, but that still
leaves a lot of people. Is this just still to new???
To Brin -- I continue to marvel
at your clear, soft and smooth-as-silk writing voice.
To me probably the most
intriguing unanswered question in all of Michael is how and why it happens that
souls (essences) can be so intrinsically different in their nature that we have
the different channels of
input, and also that we go through whole cycles of
lives, apparently, able to experience only one number of channels, whatever our
native role reflects.
We can experience anything
without limit among all the possible human creations, except a different number
of channels, it seems to me.
Is the number of channels
parameter something that is in the brain wiring somewhere that, in a normal
default way, very strongly aligns with the natural role's style with regard to
channels, so that it could only be changed by doing some yoga-like highly
focused process that changes the brain wiring? Are we physically born with 5 or
more and very soon learn to permanently shut some down, if we're not artisans?
Do psychedelics turn on, or reopen, multiple channels, or do they affect some
other similar brain wiring process?
Are the number of channels the
same in planes other than the physical? Does anyone have experience they can
remember on that?
Does the fact that the number
of channels -- 1, 2, 3, 5 -- are prime and Fibonacci numbers suggest something
along the lines of adding up the accumulated number of the axes....like if the 2
of inspiration (server and priest) is from adding its orientation to the 1 of
the solid action orientation (warrior and king), and expression (artisan and
sage) adds its orientation to the 2 of the inspiration to get 3 and 5? Does
anyone see some glimmer of something here and can they take it farther?
Why don't, as far as I know of,
any other past spiritual/metaphysical sources describe this difference between
souls that we see as roles or as channels of input?
Eagerly looking forward to
hearing what others get....
All the best, Ed
Subject: Re: pondering
As to why the Michael teachings
aren't better known....Diane's opened up Pandora's box here!
Here is a brief summary of some
history as I know of and/or (mostly) have heard it. The original group, which
began in 1973 with Sarah Chambers (Cronepower@aol.com) as the main channel, and
various later evolutions of it (with other channels) which provided the material
for Yarbro's books, were and still are very much concerned about staying hidden.
(This is not to say that is true of everyone ever involved in the groups, but it
is my impression that since Yarbro became involved, they have always agreed to
maintain a considerable level of secrecy.)
This meant that until about the
mid -1980s whatever material they got was completely unknown except in their
tiny circle except to the degree it was published, after much delay, in Yarbro's
books. People like me who discovered the Michael books had nowhere to go for
more information and likely as not it dropped out of their awareness.
Yarbro in her later books
strongly asserted that the channels in her group were the only valid Michael
channels and that anyone else claiming to be channeling Michael should be
regarded as fake.
In the early and mid-1980s JP
van Hulle began channeling Michael herself. She had been involved with the main
group. Soon she was doing it a lot of the time, and she and quite a few other
people, including others whom she trained, had an active group largely centered
in the Lafayette and Orinda area east of the Berkeley and Oakland hills. Many
books began appearing in the late '80s published by channels from this group.
The main nexus or starting point for all this activity is the Michael
M. C. Clark for several years
in the mid-80s published a quarterly magazine, The Michael Connection, with
articles, information and ads for the various channels. When she had a baby,
there wasn't time for the magazine. If there are back issues available, either
the MEF would have them or could connect people with M. C. Clark. In one of the
issues there is a fine article by Phil Gerring that covered the early history of
the Orinda group in detail.
Because Yarbro has never
supported the work of the other channels in any way, never said anything other
than they are frauds, the unfortunate situation arose that the probably hundreds
of thousands of readers of "Messages From Michael" are unaware of the
newer non-Yarbro books unless by chance they encounter the newer ones in a
bookstore. Until the last couple of years they were pretty hard to find away
from the Bay Area, and even now, usually the people shelving the books in
bookstores don't know that it would be useful to put them all in one place. Only
someone who knows the books knows they should be together.
If Yarbro would ever come
to her senses and get out of her negative poles, she, or whoever owns the rights
to her books, could do very well by advertising and selling the other books to
her readers. Most people who discover the Yarbro books would love to gobble up
the others if they only knew about them.
In the last couple of years the
lines of communications have been opening up all over, and maybe one of these
years the Yarbro folks will come out in the open and join the good fun. Let's
all create that future.
All the best, Ed Hamerstrom
Subject: Emotions and Attitudes
Lori -- If attitudes relate to
intellectual center and modes relate to moving center, are there more such
relationships? Which overleaf goes with emotional center? (Presumably not much
is left but goals?) All the best, Ed
MetaSyn@aol.com wrote: >
> Lori -- If attitudes relate to intellectual center and modes relate to
moving > center, are there more such relationships? Which overleaf goes with
> emotional center? (Presumably not much is left but goals?)
That's a good question.
What I'm getting is that the Chief Features are more what relate to the
emotional center, moreso than the Goals. The Goals would be more the integrating
factor of all the other overleaves, as in, what they all come back to fulfill.
Hmmm....more to ponder!
Subject: Illness, MS cause and
Dear Dave -- If fibromyalgia is
anything in the family of MS (or if any reader knows of someone with that
condition), there is a fine website with loads of wonderful true radical data on
MS and related conditions. See: www.2cowherd.net/q/ms.htm for all his links. The
most exciting of these to me is: www.2cowherd.net/q/embry.htm.
Embry is a Canadian geologist
whose son came down with MS. He did a lot of research and figured out all the
truths which the medical establishment doesn't want to look at. He proved that
epidemiological facts clearly rule out any possible cause for MS other than the
conventional western diet high in animal products. The disease is an extreme
case of food allergy where the exposure to the allergen has been so prolonged
that the body's defenses break down. He goes into the technical details of all
that. Anyone at all interested in health and how the body works could enjoy this
The best remedy is to abstain
from meat, dairy, eggs, legumes and yeast since these are usually the problem
substances. Embry's son recovered completely, as have many other people you can
hear of in this website. Dave Q., who maintains the site, went from
wheelchair-bound to where he bicycles 20 miles a day now. Since MS is one of the
most seemingly hopeless and depressing conditions in our culture, I urge you all
to spread this info around far and wide.
All the best, Ed
otterly wrote: > Hey to all
of you out there... I'm new to this forum and I hope my post gets there.
Hi Otterly! Glad you made
I'm not as familiar with
Shepherd's channelings as some here are, but I hear he's a fellow 2nd entitier
of mine. I sent him an e-mail about how to join this list and hoped he would but
never heard back. His material has been a hot topic around here.
watching the post s for a while and see a lot of religious talk and heirarchial
debates; is this common? I haven't seen much Michael stuff in fact. Well, I 'll
I'm curious to know why
you think there's been a lot of "religious talk and heirachical
debates." I guess I just didn't see them like that--more just as spiritual
discussions, where we've pulled in other things that seemed to relate to the
Michael information, like when Seth was saying how he found RUOW validating the
Michael material, and vice-versa.....
Thanks for your intro!
Ed's right about the
books - the only ones I know are the three Yarbro books and one (Earth To Tao)
that I found completely by accident (maybe not) in a local new age shop. Only
have the Yarbro books because my mother-in-law kindly let us borrow them -
they're long out of print here and rare as green wombats .....The Earth To Tao
book changed things as I was aware of them in the Yarbro books - slaves became
'servers', rejection became 're-evaluation' - what the difference is, I'm not
certain....Gave me a lot of insights though....
I've noticed that a lot
of the stuff discussed on this list contains other terms that are quite
unfamiliar to me. Even though I've gone through the Michael Web page, I'm still
none the wiser as to the idea behind some of these terms. For example:
1. What is the precise concept
behind "perspective"? Say for instance that John Lennon was in
'teaching' perspective (if I recall correctly) - what does it mean? From what
I've seen on the web page, it appears to be related to soul age; 'old soul' =
'teaching' perspective. If this is so, then why make the change - it becomes
overly complex where complexity isn't needed? If not, what's it all about?
2. Kate sent in her overleaves
- neat idea, I thought - let's share overleaf information. Only what do these
terms mean? i) Bleedthrough? (sounds a bit like a recording studio term!). ii)
Sage casting? iii) Imprint - seems fairly obvious but I'd like some elaboration
iv) Focussed? On what? v) Creative? What do the percentages mean on these two
terms? vi) Frequency? vii) Slide? viii) Body - how do you determine what kind of
body you drive from the list Michael gives when you're not sure? ix) How do you
determine that the body is "Venusian" or "Saturnian" or
anything else? x) Orientation? I would give my overleaves here but I've lost the
information, so I'll go from memory: Scholar, 3rd level old Chief feature; self
deprecation I remember the words power, rejection, realist coming into it
3. My vague recollection of
cadres in the Yarbro books seems completely different to the usage I find on
this list - in fact, it's so confusing that I'm not sure that they're the same
4. Lori posted what was a very
interesting Michael channelling a couple of days ago - second part forthcoming
5. Fibonacci numbers - can
someone explain this to a non-mathematician - in the Michael context? Sorry
about overly long post (self-dep...sigh...),
Subject: Replying to Sonny in
Dear Sonny -- I'll reply to
some of your questions as the sprit moves me....
1) Fibonacci Series: this is a
series of numbers where adding two consecutive ones gets the next one. They
begin 0,1,1,2,3,5,8,13,21,34,55,89. The ratio between successive ones approaches
the "golden mean", about 1.61 or so. There are all sorts of important
geometric and mathematical connections. The ratio appears often in nature.
2) You should probably get The
Michael Handbook and Tao To Earth next. A lot of additional inormation was
channeled in the '80s and '90s that isn't in the Yarbro books. A few of the
words were changed: Rejection, the goal, became Discrimination. Retardation
became Re-evaluation. Stagnation became Flow, though I think some people use
Relaxation, which I think is erroneous because relaxation is a reaction to
something, and the neutral goal just is what it is. (Relaxation could be a
substitute for Re-evaluation, I suppose, since it is rather the opposite to
Growth?) Slaves became Servers. In all of these cases the original term had a
negative slant in current English usage which needed to be replaced by something
that no one would regard as judgemental.
3) Focused/Diffuse or
Male/Female energy all refer to a characteristic each
essence has. It is described as two numbers adding to 100, like 55/45. They are
like polarities of energy. The one is focused, causative, and though it has
nothing to do with physical gender, correlates with the traditional social
stereotypes of males. The other is called diffuse, receptive, nurturing, female.
(I don't like calling it "creative" because both polarities are
creative.) The concept of focused/diffuse might be understood if you think of
people's appearances. People showing "focused" energy tend to have
bold, solid, decisive, "powerful" clothes, short hair, sharp edges if
you will. The other side is fuzzy, soft, long-haired, paisley, etc. People tend
to get along well with others of similar M/F ratio, and are best matched
romantically with opposite ratio. "Frequency" is another
characteristic expressed on a scale from 0 to 100 with most people between maybe
20 and 70. It is a gradient scale from "rock" to "space
case". There are correlations between roles and frequency, with scholars,
warriors and kings generally lower frequency than the others, and priests and
artisans tending to be highest frequency.
4) Bodytypes are mentioned in
the books above. I don't pretend to understand how they fit in theoretically
with the patterns of 7s....but they do seem to be real. They are like a template
of size and shape and possibly some other characteristics upon which the
physical body is created. People usually are blends of two or three of the
body types, and there are definite patterns by which certain ones find others
attractive or less so. Essences who want to get together as mates will commonly
choose compatible bodytypes.
I have to get off now, hope
this starts you off with the questions.
All the best, Ed Hamerstrom
I'll add my own 2 cent
> i) Bleedthrough? (sounds a
bit like a recording studio term!).>>
Having the flavor of
something while being something else. (and yes, tape bleedthrough is a good
> ii) Sage casting? >>
Casting with a strong 5
> iii) Imprint - seems
fairly obvious but I'd like some elaboration.>>
I could go on for
hours... imprinting is a major topic...
> ivFocused & > v)
Creative? What do the percentages mean on these two terms? >>
also, male/female yang/yin
etc... out of 100%, the sliding scale you fall into (say 100-0 or 50-50 or 0-100
or 25-75 or 33-66 etc...)
> vi) Frequency? >>
out of 100, genral measurement
of how 'energetic' you are. Zero is very grounded and down to earth. 100 is
highly flighty and in the clouds..
> vii) Slide? >>
You slide from one overleave
into another... usually from pole to pole, or neutral to a favorite...
> viii) Body - how do you
determine what kind of body you drive from the list >
There are some good books and
stuff on bodytype... this isn't a Michael only thing... the classic endo/ecto/meso
morph types fit very well into this (3 axis...)
>> 5. Fibonacci numbers -
can someone explain this to a non-mathematician - in >
the Michael context? another
topic for hours and hours... the golden ratio (1.618....) is a magical number...
Michael Teachings |
Site Map |
Michael FAQ |
Soul Age |
Nine Needs |
Michael Channeling |
| Channels & Resources
| Michael Tools |
Michael Books |
Michael Chat |
Student Database |
Spiritweb List Archives |
Glossary | Links