|
Home >
Roles
Index > The Sage Role
The
Sage Role
+ Expression
– Oration |
10% of the
population |
Expression |
Cardinal |
- Positive Traits:
Articulate, Colorful, Dramatic, Entertaining, Enthralling, Expressive,
Friendly, Fun-loving, Humorous, Informative, Inquisitive, Knowledgeable,
Light-hearted, Perceptive, Storyteller, Verbose, Wise
- Negative Traits:
Arrogant, Bag of Wind, Deceptive, Demands Attention, Drama Queen,
Egocentric, Gossipy, Hogs Conversations, Intrusive, Loud, Oratorical,
Overblown Sense of Entitlement, Sleazy, Tactless Bore, Tasteless
Like the
Artisan, the Sage role is also one of Expression. In
this case, the expression is usually intangible, in contrast to the Artisan.
Sages are typically involved in expressing themselves through such intangibles
as words: verbally in teaching or public speaking; or in movement: dancing and
acting. Sages are, metaphorically speaking, the face of the body
of mankind. They give expression to the higher mental activities of society with
such offerings as philosophy, theater, and the arts. As the face of mankind,
Sages give voice to the thoughts of the culture. They show in their countenance
what is going on in the consciousness of society. Sages have a need to express
themselves before the public at large.
Acting, dancing, and entertaining are some of the occupations
where Sages find fulfillment for this need to express themselves — anything
that has to do with performing on stage or before a camera. This type of thing
is especially suitable for Sages in the Positive Pole of Expression. They enjoy
the movement, the display, the spectacle, the representation, and the exhibition
of the histrionic art. Many Sages find satisfying careers in teaching,
reporting, public speaking, and newscasting — anything that has to do with
getting a message out to the public. This type of thing is especially suitable
for Sages in the Negative Pole of Oration. They enjoy hearing themselves talk,
and the words flow so easily from their mouths, that this type of activity comes
very naturally to them. They have the "gift of gab". Many Sages also
get into politics these days, since politics has become such a media event, with
leaders always before the camera and in the press. This fulfills the Sage's need
to be in the public eye. Sages have wisdom, they look good, and they speak well.
Thus they are able to appeal to a large segment of the public, and thereby get
elected. In historical times, Sages were such things as bards, minstrels, and
storytellers. In whatever occupation Sages find themselves, they apply a measure
of artistry and aesthetics to it.
The Sage's Natural
Overleaves Sages want the eyes of the world to be focused upon them. They
love to be the center of attention, and to be in the limelight. Like a person
with the
Goal of Acceptance, Sages want to be pleasant and easy to get along
with. They are typically very charming and cooperative. They desire to be suave,
polished, classy, and graceful in their behavior. Like a person in the
Power
Mode, Sages are normally self-confident in their behavior, and proceed as if
they "had their act together." Like a person with the
Feature of
Greed, Sages can be very much into loving themselves. They want everything
coming in to them, and nothing going out. They often use, exploit, and
manipulate other people in order to get what they want. In a manner of speaking,
Sages view themselves as the center of the universe. That is, they are very
subjective about everything — they consider how events in their lives relate
to themselves personally: "What does this mean to me? How does this affect
me?" Like an
Idealist, Sages typically have an innocent, utopian,
high-minded attitude toward life. They are friendly and gregarious — everybody
is their brother. They feel at home in a crowd, and are always learning,
absorbing, and taking in thoughts and ideas from the environment. Sages soak up
knowledge like sponges — they usually read a lot. Sages are typically
philosophical minded, concerned with the higher meaning of things in their
lives. They want to see the pattern of life, and get the big picture. Wisdom is
generally the province of Sages.
It is often said of Sages that they are "dingey".
They have some trouble with physical reality because their minds and thoughts
are usually in the abstract, artistic or philosophical realms. At an extreme,
Sages tend to live in their own dreamy fantasy world. Sages often fall prey to
their own imaginations, and are victims of their own delusions. They have a hard
time facing reality. They are prone to think that the real world works like
their imaginary world. Obviously this can get them into trouble when this proves
not to be the case. It is wise for Sages to find people who are more down to
earth (for instance, Artisans) to take care of the everyday affairs of life so
that they can devote themselves to their artistic or fantasy lives, or to their
philosophical musings about the abstract meaning of things.
This factor shows up very much in the profession in which
Sages are commonly involved — acting. Sages come up with ideas for stories
with profound meaning. And then they play the starring roles in the radio,
movie, or television productions of these stories. But it takes persons with
technical know-how to make them happen, to bring the stories into the real,
tangible world — lights, cameras, stage scenery, special effects: the
"nuts and bolts" of the production. This is where Artisans come in. It
takes the Sage/Artisan Complementary team to complete the Expression Dimension.
Sages view the world as a stage and themselves as actors. They are attuned to
the dramatic and theatrical elements of life. Even if they are not involved in a
career of acting, Sages are natural-born actors. They love to "ham it
up" before an audience. Sages regard other people as their audience, before
whom it is their privilege to perform continually. Some might think that to put
on a show for others is being phony, because acting is not real. But Sages
really find their fulfillment in acting — this is their sincerity and their
integrity. Sages are naturally good at imitating, impersonating, and mimicking
other people. They easily take on, assume, and absorb the traits of other
people, then express these traits back out to the world in their performances.
A Flair For Drama
Because Sages interpret life in terms of drama, they often
lead lives that are suitable material for a soap opera. After all, they want to
live a good story, not just tell a good story. In their personal lives, they
play out all the great issues: power and weakness, comedy and tragedy, romance
and loneliness, courage and cowardice, success and failure, and so on. Life is
not meaningful to them unless they are playing out these various grand dramas.
Sages are very much concerned with how they look to others.
How they appear to strangers is very important to them. They rarely go out in
public without fixing up and dressing up. They are naturally photogenic — they
look good in pictures and on camera. If there is a physical appearance that is
common to many Sages, it is that they are pleasing, attractive, distinctive, and
attention-getting. The most distinguished, beautiful, and handsome people are
likely Sages, because of their concern for self-image. Image, rather than
substance, is their interest. The Hollywood glitz, glitter and glamour scene is
the ultimate expression of this. This superficial and surface approach to life
can be difficult for many Sages to overcome. Sages have a lot of depth of
wisdom, if only they do not dress it up too much with a story that just sounds
good or a picture that simply looks good. Sages emphasize the cover of the book
rather than the book itself. Themselves may "judge the book by its
cover", and thus be fooled by unscrupulous individuals with smooth tongues
and honest appearances.
This brings us to another factor regarding Sages. Sages are
usually rather shrewd and clever, being concerned as they are with wisdom. But
they can turn this to the abuse of others because of their selfishness. In their
worst manifestation, Sages tend to think the world owes them a living just
because they are attractive and charming. They expect others to give them gifts
of appreciation, to throw money at their feet for a great performance. For this
reason, Sages may think that they are justified in taking advantage of other
people. They think fools are fair game if they can talk them out of their money.
Sages can often make a living off of swindling and bilking alone. As consummate
actors, Sages are the archetypal "con artists". By looking good and
sounding good, they dupe gullible people into buying into their get-rich-quick
schemes. Even if they are not dishonest, Sages still think they can talk their
way into or out of anything. They can be glib and loquacious, especially if they
are in the Negative Pole of Oration. They are inclined to believe that just
saying it makes it so, without having to do any real work to make it so.
Another problem with Sages is that they are so needful of
attention for themselves that they are not always capable of giving attention to
others. Sages are inwardly focused, and very much aware of themselves and their
own needs and desires. They are so wrapped up in, and so much of their energy is
spent in, their own life drama, that they do not have the time or energy for
others. Also, since they are so public-at-large oriented, they find it difficult
to concentrate their attention on individuals who may be desirous of their help
or attention. In other words, Sages tend to spread themselves too thin to be of
much assistance to just one person.
There have been quite a number of famous Sages. And with good
reason. Sages seek fame. They want to be known — the more to whom their name
and face is know the more successful the Sage regards himself. Some famous Sages
who fulfilled their Role very well are:
-- Phil Wittmeyer
More About The Sage
Sages are the wordsmiths of the world. They are the great communicators, and masters of verbal expression that in a characteristically fun-loving way, awaken us to the possibility of insight and wisdom.
In fact, it's been humorously suggested that the Sage must not only have the
last word, but the last 50,000. There may be some truth in such levity, but as we shall learn, there is much more to the Sage than just the proverbial bag of wind.
The Sage is truly gifted at collecting and disseminating unique information that can make a difference in our lives. Natural performers, they have the remarkable ability to capture our attention and simultaneously entertain us while they tickle our minds with valuable knowledge. Such gifts make them superb teachers, and their unparalleled skills at communication help them realize success as actors, authors, and speakers. Sages also have a natural affinity for humor, and can be outstanding comedians, with a special flair for the outrageous and the absurd.
If there is a common thread that links most Sages, it might be their natural inclination to teach. Although wise and perceptive, a Sage's brand of teaching need not be formal or suffer from the stale reek of academia. Important lessons can be taught through the use of satire, humor, or playful banter. As educators, Sages will sometimes delude themselves into believing everything they say is true, but if they simply remember to use the default wiring that allows them to touch life lightly, they can be the greatest of teachers.
Sages can also excel at bending the truth. In their darker mode, they can be masters of deceit, manipulating and distorting the facts to suit their own self interests. Used car salesmen come to mind, or those oily $500 an hour lawyers we just love to hate.
Humorously, in the negative pole of Oration, Sages can be like human flycatchers, with mouths perpetually open as they pummel their victims with an endless barrage of tornado-like verbiage. The path of destruction left during the wake of such Sage-inspired word rubble rarely leaves room for a rebuttal. Thus, it appears an unwritten law in the Universe might be: Never argue with a Sage!
As revealed, Sages can be great "drama queens." Loving to be
the center of attention, Sages have been known to occasionally throw tantrums
with the histrionic intensity reminiscent of a Messiah being nailed to a cross.
Apparently the consummate acting talents of the Sage can not be denied, and this can be one of the greatest challenges for them: Sages tend to metaphorically live life on stage, performing and basking in the applause from their audience rather than living with an intention to communicate and make connections with others. This strong need for being in the public eye can sometimes be their shortcoming when it comes to addressing the needs of others;
sometimes Sages are just too wrapped up in their own soap operas.
Despite these shortcomings, Sages are just plain fun, and they never cease to amaze us with their taste for aesthetics and the artistic sensibilities they bring to all endeavors. With their sparkling wit, theatrical flair, and a seemingly endless reservoir of fascinating stories, Sages can entertain those around them for hours on end. Colorful, scintillating, expressive, charming, perceptive, dynamic, and rarely boring, Sages stand out in the crowd. Whether they choose to be outrageous or informative, the Sage is an insightful emissary of the human condition, masterfully bridging playfulness with wisdom. They may try to claim center stage, but then again, the Sage has something to say.
-- David Gregg
Compatibility
With Other Roles
Sage-Server: Servers and
sages can work quite well as long as the servers are not too much “by-the-book”
kinds of people; some servers are, and sages do not tend to be—they like to play
with the book, to stretch and expand it, rather than adhere strictly to any sort
of pattern. (Sage is the five-position role, and the number five has a positive
pole of expansion (positive pole of number five.) Servers who are bureaucratic,
who see going by the book as what is best for the common good, tend to irritate
sages to no end—and vice versa. However, if the servers are not doing their
negative pole in that way, this is generally a good combination, because servers
tend to be quite willing to let sages have the spotlight. Artisans, who also
work well with sages, may or may not be willing to do that—they may just go off
and do something else. They will not tend to try to stop sages from being in the
spotlight, but servers are more likely to really listen and be supportive, fully
receiving the expression (positive pole of sage) of sages. Sages can be very
grateful for that. Also, sages are often heart people. They may be quite
intellectual and verbal, but they rarely become nearly as emotionally dry as
scholars can be. Servers in their positive pole can epitomize the good heart, so
servers and sages can love each other very deeply, in some ways more than
servers and priests, because both servers and priests tend to stay busy taking
care of other people. Servers might nurture priests, but priests might be out
taking care of three hundred other people. Although sages might be entertaining
three hundred other people, that is not as involving as the caretaking that
priests engage in.
Sage-Artisan:
Sages can be anchoring for artisans, and they can have much joy together. Sages
are often able to cultivate the humor in artisans, so that they are truly
playmates. Sages can make it safe for artisans to be more childlike, whereas
artisans may not feel that this is permitted with the other roles, even with
other artisans—artisans may feel that they have to try to be more adult, because
the relationship does not feel very well anchored. Sages, however, usually have
a pretty good grasp on external realities, since they are the ones who
interconnect and communicate with everyone. So with sages, artisans can feel
anchored but at the same time have the ability to express themselves. Sometimes
sages push artisans to bring their creations (positive pole of artisan)” before
the public eye. That can be quite useful for artisans, but it may also bring up
fear, since artisans are generally not as sturdy and do not feel that they hold
up well in the public eye. So there can be a bit of a push-pull here. There is
the need to put forth the artisans’ works, but if sages push artisans too much,
there may be too much fear coming out at once for artisans to deal with it
constructively.
Sage-Warrior: Sage-warrior is a good
combination because there is the ability to laugh together, but whereas sages
can procrastinate and play, warriors tend to exert pressure to get down to
business as well. Warriors can play, but after the time for that has passed,
warriors are ready to move on. So this is balancing. Also, warriors are not
generally very good at articulating, although there are exceptions to
this—centering plays a part—and, of course, sages are expert at this, so sages
can help warriors with their communication. Warriors sometimes feel that sages
understand them well because warriors do not have to say everything—sages can
intuit some of it, and warriors very much appreciate that. All the same, sages
can put pressure on warriors to at least try to verbalize their feelings,
because sages want to hear the words—the words are their validation—even if they
already know, even if they are getting the communication nonverbally, which they
often do.
Sage-Scholar: Sage and
scholar is also a good combination. Both love knowledge (positive pole of
scholar) and information. Scholars are sometimes envious of sages, because
scholars tend to fear that they are not as “spicy,” as interesting, as the other
roles, and there is no role more potentially spicy than sages. (Sages feel that
they have to be, in order to get everyone’s attention.) The fact of the matter
is that scholars are usually genuinely content not being in the limelight—being
wallflowers, even—but your society rewards sages with acclaim much more often.
If scholars feel a lack of self-esteem, they can be envious of sages. I’ve
noticed that scholars can easily find sages irritating because scholars want
knowledge (positive pole of scholar) to be just caretaken: neutral and
available. Sages, on the other hand, often want to elaborate on it or exaggerate
it. Scholars distrust that, feeling that there’s some distortion or ego in it. A
spice in your food can taste good in the right quantity, but can irritate if
there’s too much of it. Sages often feel the urge to exaggerate when they are
fulfilling their role of storyteller. The story has to be made interesting,
larger than life. Most people find movies, for example, that present stories
faithfully—in life-size projections rather than larger-than-life—to be boring.
They have to be magnified somehow. But sages can get carried away with this—just
as any role can get carried away with whatever it is doing—and not respect
boundaries. This can also be a factor in starting and expanding rumors. There is
a certain amount of heightening of reality that reality can tolerate without
being distorted. In great art, reality may, in fact, be clarified by being
heightened, by being put under a magnifying glass. That is really what sages are
trying to do. However, if they lack skill or insight, they may distort it, which
puts them in their negative pole, oration (negative pole of sage). Scholars are
more concerned about the purity of information, but they are not more dedicated
to truth than sages. Scholars tend to see truth as fact; sages tend to see truth
as what reveals the moral or insight of the story, since story is a big part of
what sages are about. Sages in the negative pole can be irritating to everyone,
but we would not overemphasize the conflict between sages and scholars;
generally, they are quite complementary. Scholars like how forthcoming sages are
in providing information. Sages do not see it as an inconvenience, as a warrior,
for example, might, if he’s trying to get on to doing the next thing. Sages know
that disseminating information is their job, their role. And sages see scholars
as possible sources of “news they can use,” although the way scholars operate is
to take a big chunk of raw data and slowly distill it; if scholars give their
knowledge (positive pole of scholar) before it has been well distilled, it can
be more than is needed or can be used. Scholars are willing to provide data at
any stage in the distillation process, because it is all interesting to them,
but the other roles generally just want the end result: the fully distilled
version, the conclusions, the bottom line. That would also be why scholars like
each other so much. Right—there is mutual appreciation of the whole process.
Sages, being an expression role, do not hesitate to express to scholars just
what information they want or do not want. If they do this without tact, that
can be offensive to scholars. Sages are usually pretty tactful, but sages who
have a warrior essence twin or warrior casting, for example, may be more blunt.
Sages, warriors, and scholars all tend to have particularly well-developed
senses of humor; so sages are another role that scholars can play with. However,
scholars are prone to the kind of puns and word play sometimes called
“groaners,” and sages may tease scholars about this. Underneath, sages usually
enjoy the word play or pun anyway. Sages do not really look down their noses at
it (even though they may pretend to) because they appreciate all kinds of humor,
even those that are not their own kind. If the humor is particularly complex or
clever, sages may feel admiration and respect—even if it is not, in fact, all
that funny. Wherever there is a demonstration of expressive ability, sages will
acknowledge that on some level. Scholars can be particularly humorous in their
writing—often in a tongue-in-cheek way. Their humor is not as dramatic as that
of sages, but it can be pleasant to read. Sages’ humor tends to be more broad
and accessible, and being expressive, it tends to work better in performance
than scholars’ humor. Scholars are not very often good at stand-up comedy, for
example. They are just not expressive enough—unless they have a sage essence
twin, or another expressive influence—to deliver their thoughts with enough
spice. On paper it does not matter—the humor is all in the words themselves, and
no role is more expert with words per se than scholars. What about sages’
ability with words? Scholars are generally the most facile in vocabulary and the
intrinsic use of words—what words go where—whereas sages are more clever in
manipulating words and playing with their meanings, as with innuendo. The
scholarly puns and word games are more about the structure of words themselves
than about playing with their meaning, as sages are more prone to do. Sages, of
course, can also be funny on paper with words, but scholars can be endless in
their ability to mine the gold in words themselves.
Sage-Sage: The only trouble spot between two
sages is that both tend to be reluctant to yield the floor to the other. So if
the sages involved have learned to be good listeners as well as good
talkers—which is not very common—that problem is minimized. Sages can feel
relieved to be in the presence of other sages who want to play, laugh, and joke,
and who “get” and appreciate their jokes, especially if their sense of humor is
a little off-the-wall. Sages’ sense of humor that is meant for the mainstream,
which includes all the roles, is more, you could say, commercial; sages tend to
save their more eccentric or leading-edge humor for other sages and maybe
artisans who will get it. Warriors and scholars also tend to appreciate sages’
sense of humor, but do not always plug in to it in the same way. Sages, then,
can have much fun with each other. They can have long talks that may be in
either their positive or negative pole, but often they have a sense of
accomplishment through these conversations, and just the good feeling of being
heard and received when each has enough time to share all he wishes to. On the
other hand, these relationships can be shallow: if sages perform for each other
instead of genuinely relating, there is not too much “glue” holding these
relationships together or a sense of balance in them.
Sage-Priest:
This combination can be problematic, or it can be quite good. The problem would
be competition, trying to get the attention of the same congregation/audience.
Since both are exalted (cardinal), and both often like to talk a great deal, it
can be difficult for either role to feel that they are fully being received.
And, in some ways, they tend to not understand each other very well. On the
other hand, they can get along quite well for a similar reason to the reason two
scholars may get along—they may feel like colleagues; they may complement each
other. Sages are an expression role, but may feel a secondary impulse to inspire
as well. So, for example, sage actors might want their performance not only to
be technically good and to communicate what the author intended, but also to be
inspiring, uplifting, and enlightening. Sages may see that as leaving the
audience with more insight or understanding. Priests may see inspiration as more
purely an emotional feeling of upliftment and dedication. However, these two
approaches are not at cross purposes, and sages and priests can work together as
a team. So if they are mature enough to give each other an opportunity to be
fully received, the relationship can work quite well, but this combination can
take more work than many of the others.
Sage-King: Sages and kings can also get
along very well. They do not tend to compete, as you might think they would.
Sages can successfully convince kings to let down their hair and not be “on
duty” all the time, although even then, even when recreating, kings do not tend
to go off duty completely. Also, sages love to advise kings, to give
information. However, if kings are in their negative pole, tyranny (negative
pole of king), it can quickly bring sages into their negative pole, oration
(negative pole of sage), because in tyranny kings are not really listening to
sages’ advice. Then sages may start to bluster in order to try to make kings
listen, to try to get through. Also, sages, like artisans, like to live a little
bit by the seat of their pants; they do not like to toe the line. So if kings
become bossy, there can be some big fights between kings and sages. I think of
the archetype of the court jester and king—it could be quite volatile and
fraught with drama. Right. Since sages are a cardinal role, they can generally
hold their own with kings, unless they have a goal of submission, or goal of
acceptance, which makes it harder for sages to fight. This combination works
best when kings’ overleaves are relatively soft. But sages generally do not mind
fighting with kings, and kings may secretly admire the sages’ repartee. Kings
may feel that they can learn something from sages’ retorts or insights.
-- Shepherd Hoodwin
From "The Journey of Your Soul"
|
Famous Sages:
Bella Abzug, Jennifer Aniston, Leonard Bernstein, Jack Black,
Lenny Bruce, Kate Bush, Michael Caine, Jim Carrey, Miguel Cervantes,
Bill Clinton, George Clooney, Stephen Colbert, Toni Collette, Tom
Cruise, Jeff Daniels, Cameron Diaz, Alexander Dumas, Duke Ellington,
William Faulkner, Albert Finney, David Frost, Janeane Garofalo,
George Gershwin, Angelina Jolie, Stephen King, Keira Knightley, Jay
Leno, Shirley MacLaine, Eddie Murphy, Carolyn Myss, Jack Nicholson,
Luciano Pavarotti, Matthew Perry, Carl Sagan, Peter Sellers, Howard
Stern, Tom Wilkinson, Marianne Williamson, Oprah Winfrey |
Sage Photos
See Pictures
of Sages at the Role Photo Database
Next
page | The Warrior Role
.....................................................................................................................................
Michael Teachings |
Site Map |
Welcome |
Introduction |
Michael FAQ |
Soul Age |
Roles |
Overleaves |
Advanced
Topics |
Nine Needs |
Michael Channeling |
Related Articles
| Channels & Resources
| Michael Tools |
Michael Books |
Michael Chat |
Michael
Student Database |
Role Photos
|
Spiritweb List Archives |
Personality
Profile |
Translations |
Glossary | Links
|
|