|
Home
>
Related
Articles > Spiritweb
Michael Spiritweb
Michael List
1997 - Week 39
|
SUMMARY:
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Praesent
vestibulum molestie lacus. Aenean nonummy
hendrerit mauris. Phasellus porta. Fusce suscipit varius mi. Cum
sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur
ridiculus mus. Nulla dui.
|
THE POSTS:
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 1997 14:45:25 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: Digest No. 1997-09-29 of Michael Teachings List
Hello! I'm new to the list, and happy to be aboard. I'm going to try to
look at the archives.
> Kenneth Broom, Columbia, MD, USA
> INFP, 7th Level Old Scholar/Server, Observation, Acceptance, Idealist,
> Emotional Part of Intellectual Center, Impatience, Mercurial
Kenneth, I have almost the same profile, except I'm a
sage with sage e.t.
and have a lunar/martial/venusian
body type. BTW, what does INFP mean (I'm
still learning all the abbreviations).
I saw a couple Ramtha videos years ago--that was my only exposure to him
(or JZ Knight). I liked about 90% of it, and 10% of it really bothered me. I
didn't like his authoritarian style, either, although it may be good for
people just starting out on their path who need spiritual parenting before
they can come into their own power, or who need to be kicked in the pants
before they'll open up (tough love, as it were).
Here is what I channeled, transcribed from a tape, for a client who had
been involved in the Ramtha group for many years and felt guilty about
leaving:
"Your experience with Ramtha was designed to just open you up, to break
through stuck patterns in your life, to help you to begin to feel a
relationship with the larger universe. Our impression is that you did not
have a specific agreement with Ramtha, but that your essence simply used
whoever was available, and we think that by the time the channeling began to
be distorted more blatantly, this group had already served its purpose in
your development.
It is not in your path in this lifetime to have one guru. You are really
going to increasingly find that you are your own guru, your own teacher, and
that you will draw from many teachers, maybe including us. There are some
people who need the experience of following, of yielding to an outward
figure, channeled or not -- it does not matter, it is the same thing -- and
there were some in your group that were there by specific agreement to be
there. Many others, however, find their way into such groups simply because
it is the one they know about. Some find benefit and stick around for a
while. Some receive little or no benefit but stay around out of a need to
belong or feelings of guilt about wanting to leave, maybe thinking that
leaving would be betrayal of God or their spirituality, or only indicative
of resistance. It is preferable if those in a spiritual group feel genuinely
drawn to be there--it keeps the energy cleaner. In this group at this time
there is much dead wood. You could say that the group has gone to seed. It
has mostly outlived its purpose and there are few left who were spiritually
meant to be together. What is left is mostly those of the types we described
-- those who feel loyal (perhaps it was something that was meant for them in
the past), those who just want to belong to something, or those who are
curious but not very committed.
This soul Ramtha is not unknown to us. His teaching is partly a repayment of
karma, an attempt to help those whom he harmed. There is a genuine desire to
help on his part. However, his channel is not very altruistic. The channel
has much, shall we say, self-centeredness. Inevitably, if a channel or
psychic is not moving toward greater and greater openness to unconditional
love, the work will sour. It has been said, and we think there is much truth
in this, that you cannot stay in the same place; you can either go forward
or you can drift backward. We believe that this channel was moving forward
and growing at first and then hit against a wall of her deepest, darkest
blocks. Her fear was too great to get through them, so then she started to
regress. She had a couple of recent past lives that were most painful and
traumatic, with some heavy torture. We also believe there was some abuse in
her childhood in this lifetime,* all of which she has had trouble facing.
Facing trauma at first may mean reexperiencing the awful pain.
Ramtha himself is quite clever. He feels that he reached enlightenment at a
certain point, but there is much yet for him to learn. He certainly has much
to teach, but he is not what we would call a high teacher; he is not yet
fully objective.
Also, he is aware that there is distortion in the channel and is waiting it
out to see if she moves, if the blocks move. If they do not, there could be
a sudden death. She is very depressed. There is much pressure against the
blocks. Because of her channeling, she risks heart attack or stroke or some
such attack, if she does not open her heart."
*I was not aware of the rape JZ endured at age four that Ed mentioned.
Shepherd Hoodwin
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 1997 17:44:37 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Welcome Shepherd!!!
In a message dated 97-09-29 14:46:28 EDT, Shepherd writes:
<< Hello!
I'm new to the list, and happy to be aboard. I'm going to try to look at the
archives. >>
Hey Shepherd! :-)
Glad to see you got your boarding pass on the Michael luxury train of
indefinite verbiage. I believe you'll find this to be a fairly affable
collection of personalities, from the scholars who stimulate our senses with
the pungent emissions of academia, to the sages who constantly dislocate their
shoulders describing the big fish that they caught. Of course, lets not forget
the chemically deprived artisans, or the warriors or Kings who add occasional
excitement by publicly licking moldy cottage cheese off the chubby thighs of
geriatric souls with problem flatulence, or would that be the job of the
servers? I don't know yet, but heck, that's why I'm on this list!
BTW, did anyone tell you of the initiation rights for this list? No?????
Ok, well I can't reveal the exact nature of the process, but to prepare I'd
suggest you take a trip to Mexico, visit unpronounceable cities like
Zxqcnxcxclqnxinzqnlnxn and perhaps partake in live human sacrifices. ;-p
Anyhow, welcome aboard! :-)
Dave - (author of "How to cook a Cat") when the hideous shrieks
and pathetic scratching stops -- it's done.
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 1997 16:59:30 -0400
Subject: Re: Welcome Shepherd!!!
Hello Shepherd! I'm Lorraine and I'm a rookie myself. Haven't gotten many
words in edge wise, but then again, I haven't had time. I only have access to
a computer at work and when I arrived this morning, I had 49
messages!!!%^$$#$%$#amp;^*&^&(*(*&*& It takes a week (no, not
really!!) to read them all, and by then, I've got 49 more!!!!! Oh well, I've
written some lovely pieces in my head!
Love and Light,
Lorraine
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 1997 18:17:53 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: INFP
In a message dated 97-09-29 14:46:28 EDT, Shepherd writes:
<< BTW, what does INFP mean (I'm
still learning all the abbreviations). >>
INFP is the categorical results and designation from either the
Meyers-Briggs or Keisey personality tests. Unbelievably, I happen to be an
INFP as well. This type of personality is an idealist in a smaller sub
category sometimes called a healer or tutor. But I'm sure Ken will add the
final word on this subject, so without further adieu, (pulling back
curtain)...."ladies and gentlemen, introducing...Mr.Ken Broome" :-)
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 1997 15:40:12 +0000
Subject: Re: INFP
Dave Gregg wrote:
> INFP is the categorical results and
designation from either the Meyers-Briggs
> or Keisey personality tests. Unbelievably, I happen to be an INFP as
well.
If you're curious, there are several sites to take the test from Keirsey's
book _Please Understand Me_ (oh, how I detest that title!) that will generate
your typology along with a general description of your temperament. Try "www.keirsey.com".
Like the Michael system, it's a cool tool for understanding people across
fairly specific dimensions.
Welcome Shepherd!
Dean
(INTJ)
Subject: Re: The "real" Michael? (1997-37/536)
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 1997 16:19:40 -0700
| From: Diane L. Smith
| Subject: RE:The "real" Michael?
| Date: Sat, 20 Sep 97 16:21:34 UT
|
| Dick, your words induced me to ponder and the thought that struck me was
| a concurrence with what you had to say. I will never profess to being a
| "great" reader but I will state that I enjoy reading immensely and
have
| done a lot in the last 30 years. Writing is another story all together.
| I find that task extremely difficult. So let me see if I can say this
| the way I mean for it to be understood. In all the many years that I
| have been reading and the diverse text that I have read, the Michael
| Teachings...the actual channeled words seem to have a certain "ring,
| feeling, sense" to them.
Diane, your words are indeed meaningful. When I first read this, I decided
to keep it (I use the archive as a BBS rather than getting all posts via
email). But it took several days of background pondering for me to realize the
wisdom of your observation.
I've always liked reading the actual quotes from Michael; for me that is
one of the endearing qualities of the original Yarbro books. The newer books
have more recent and up-to-date information, but their use of direct quotes is
sparse by comparison. I agree - the actual quotes have a certain ring,
feeling, and sense to them. I was present recently when someone who has
Intellectual as their 3rd centering was heard to say that books are
effectively passé. My feeling is - possibly in the future, but fortunately
not just yet.
Regards,
Dick [2.1(3)/5/4.2-144=4.7.3<5.150/4.5=26/0.4.11>]
----------------------------------------------------
Dick Hein / Mountain View, California.
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 1997 20:48:51 -0400
Subject: Re: Digest No. 1997-09-29 of Michael Teachings List
ShepherdH@aol.com wrote:
[clipped]
> > Kenneth Broom, Columbia, MD, USA
> > INFP, 7th Level Old Scholar/Server, Observation, Acceptance,
Idealist,
> > Emotional Part of Intellectual Center, Impatience, Mercurial
>
> Kenneth, I have almost the same profile, except I'm a sage with sage
e.t. and
> have a lunar/martial/venusian body type. BTW, what does INFP mean (I'm
still
> learning all the abbreviations).
Dear Shepherd,
Welcome to the Michael Teachings List. The INFP is a shorthand for my
"Myers-Briggs Type Indicator" preferences. Below please find a very
brief summary of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator preferences. It has been
fully validated, and is used by many psychologists and Organization
Development consultants.
There a few websites on the internet that go into the Myers-Briggs stuff in
greater detail. Do a search on "Myers-Briggs" and on "Keirsey
Bates"
Personal Interest Flow: Extraversion or Intraversion
Perception Preferences: Sensing or iNtuition
Decision Process Preference: Thinking or Feeling
Living Preference: Judgement or Perception
So INFP means Introvert - iNtuitive - Feeling - Perception
Peace and Light to You and Yours,
Kenneth Broom, Columbia, MD, USA
aka I.A.M. Research
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
7th Level Old Scholar, Observation, Acceptance, Idealist,
Emotional Part of Intellectual Center, Impatience. (INFP)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 1997 18:59:46 +0000
Subject: Re: Infant King Ramtha
> This reminds me of an amusing (in
retrospect) thing that happened
> several years ago. I was playfully imitating Ramtha's foot-stomping,
> wide-kneed, hands-on-knees, elbows-out, INDEED-speaking dialog for some
friends.
ROTFL. That is pretty comical in retrospect. I guess I was so awed by the
energy at the workshops that I hadn't noticed the extreme mannerisms so much.
SO BE IT!
> About a minute into my impression, the
energy around me
> changed, and I knew I had gone too far into the imitation. I could feel
> this powerful energy around me, as though something was saying
"OK, you
> want to play, then here's the real thing." It scared me a little
bit,
> and I immediately stopped the imitation, and never tried it again.
Maybe instead of stopping you should have opened yourself to the energy. I
probably would've been scared too, though. I can see Ramtha laughing while a
puddle of urine forms around my feet.
> Now, right this moment, I just
"got" the idea that I can, by "imitating"
> an element of the scenario, enter any scenario that I desire, at any
> level that I desire, in any time frame that I desire. Anything
> conceivable can be manifested. This must be investigated. Happy little
> scholar me.
If you decide to go with this, please let us know what you discover.
John Rogers
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 1997 21:29:22 -0600
From: Gloria Constantin
Subject: INITIATION RITES
Of all the disgusting things you slobbered all over the Michael List in
your welcome to Shepherd, which of course you merely used as a forum for your
own narcissistic belchings and pukings, you definitively crossed the line with
your mention of how to cook cats. When the shrieks are over, and the pathetic
scratchings too, huh? No, YOU'RE done. You've gone too far this time, Dave.
Were you waiting for someone to help you with boundaries? I'll give you a few.
I work closely with the Humane Society of Boulder and on an almost daily
basis witness the suffering of many animals, cats included. These animals are
suffering because people like yourself so easily fall into objectifying and
devaluing that which they have easy power over. References intended to be
humorous around the issues of power over, and which often involve helpless
animals (not to mention certain "classes" of humans) I believe only
help to validate and affirm behaviors that lead to the cruel treatment of
those weaker than ourselves. I can't buy into the "oh, it's all in
fun" mentality. It hurts too much. I've spent a great deal of my own
personal energy, and know personally of many who are working to save
mistreated animals. I will never acknowledge humor in such jokes. For myself,
the workers of the Society, and the cats that find their way there, it does
not exist.
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 1997 23:34:41 -0400
Subject: Higher Centers and Ramtha Imitation
John Rogers wrote:
[clipped]
> If you decide to go with this, please
let us know what you discover.
per Kenneth:
A little while back I started channeling about the Higher Centers. After I got
two posts out my own higher centers staying open full-time (unless I
consciously shut them down), and the
channeling mode changed from a
conversation-type mode to a rote-type mode. I felt myself open up to all that
is to be known about the higher centers. This is like a large physical mass of
knowledge just waiting for me to access it, and its depth and immensity is
most certainly not amenable (by me) to verbal presentation in an email
posting... yet. There's just so "much" concrete data there. I'll
continue to wait a little while longer for myself to grow more comfortable
with this level of access. The Michaels say they had little to do with my
mental goings-on other than being on one end of a long series of higher
conversations, and that it is just the next step in my spiritual growth.
I now know one more big thing, and that is "The longer we are attuned
to, or even think about, higher beings, and/or higher realities, the stronger
and higher our own conscious connection to our own higher beingness."
It's like pulling yourself up by your own bootstraps. The higher you try to
reach, the higher you can reach.
How does this connect with my Ramtha imitation? In doing the imitation I
unknowingly connected to his essence while trying to imitate his actions. I
could feel his presence, and now I can entirely understand how his energies
could burn out a body. This also had a stepping-up effect on my own abilities
and sensibilities. Being a scholar gives a fragment the ability to do or be
whatever is needed in order to attain a specific goal, especially if that goal
is more knowledge and more research and more experience. My essence attuned me
to Ramtha and thus he was there with me.
This is the basis for my statement in a previous posting on Sunday
September 28th:
"Now, right this moment, I just "got" the idea that I can, by
"imitating" an element of the scenario, enter any scenario that I
desire, at any level that I desire, in any time frame that I desire. Anything
conceivable can be manifested."
Words can't do this stuff justice. So, nuff said for the nonce.
Peace and Light to You and Yours,
Kenneth Broom, Columbia, MD, USA
aka I.A.M. Research
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
7th Level Old Scholar, Observation, Acceptance, Idealist,
Emotional Part of Intellectual Center, Impatience. (INFP)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 1997 02:16:06 -0400
Subject: Re: Ed: Advice for John 2
Ed wrote:
> Now for further unsolicited
advice.....I sense you having a feeling of
> imprisonment from the idea of having to stay in the military for 9
> years for the "should" of medical benefits and pensions,
etc., which abrades
> with the increasing "quickening" that makes it more like 900
years of change.
> All I ask, with no suggested answer or implication, is why do you
believe
> you have to put up with that? Old souls are very good at knowing what
they do
> and don't prefer to experience and you sense that well. You are
thoroughly
> competent and the universe/guides/essences, etc., would love to help
> orchestrate a better situation if you ask for it. If the only problem
is
> that you are burdened with the social fear-based reality imprints about
> retirement, starving to death and medical financial catastrophes and
> other good stuff like that, I can engage you with withering barrages of
> deadly arguments from my realist perspective (though that wouldn't be
much
> fun) that might help to dissipate the fear-based imprint. For one, I'll
> promise you that within a few years the boomers will pass some kind of
health
> insurance system that will cover all the things everyone is worried
about. Fear
> of medical financial catastrophe wiping out family resources affects
conservatives,
> too, and something will happen. Our system does work when a large
enough
> consensus forms on some course of action.
Amen, Ed. I totally agree with your take on reality. <G>
> Therefore...ask yourself lots of
questions: Why do I believe that?
> What would happen if I did, or didn't do that? What am I afraid of
about XYZ?
> Do I choose or choose not to go along with "should" ABC? By
what reasoning
> am I limiting myself as to thus and so, and is it reason or fear? And
so
> on. Asking questions is VERY powerful.
Yes, I agree with this totally, too. A saying of mine (from my guides
originally) for many decades has been the old aphorism, "It isn't the
answers that matter so much as the questions." Questions keep you alive,
glowing, moving. (A big plus for those of us in
Growth, John. <G> )
Kate
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 1997 02:41:37 -0400
Subject: ETs
Barbara Taylor wrote:
> About ET's: John, the very intense
energy can be karmic, rather than
> meeting an ET. My ex-husband and I married after knowing each other
> only 3 weeks and were married for more than 21 years -- no ET
> relationship there, just very strong agreements and maybe something
> karmic. I've never asked about it, because when it was time to move
> on, it was very clear to both of us.
Another point on determining
essence twin status, Kay Kamala and I worked together to
try and channel if my second husband was my ET or not. I felt pretty strongly
he was because I had purposely summoned my "soul twin" to me using
some strong spiritual techniques. Recently I had a reading with Emily Baumbach,
sending her a picture of my supposed ET. She said something interesting. She
wasn't getting 100% whether he was or was not my ET because she (channeling
Michael) said the summoning put him in the position of "acting like an
ET." The confusion in figuring out if he was my ET was in being sure
about his Role. He was originally read to be a
Scholar, but on recently
thinking it over, I realized that he was more likely a Priest-Artisan, and
Emily, channeling Michael and of her own judgment, agreed.
I agree that there can be some very intense marriage
monads that don't
involve ET's.
I think, though, that if in *your* gut, John, you sense your wife is your
ET, then I would trust that perception. Michael said in my recent reading, and
always says, that self-validation is the key. :)
Kate
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 1997 02:50:40 -0400
Subject: Re: Scholars in Observation & Life Task
John Rogers wrote:
> OHMYGODYES! Counting the days till
they fly away from the nest.
> That's another thing that really pisses off my ww (warrior wife).
>
> What is really interesting is my wife is working towards (a) a
> nervous breakdown. She is bigtime doing the melodramatic thing, and
> in addition to all of the above I am supposed to take care of her
> too. There are a number of things contributing to this, but she
> refuses to slow down and quit trying to save the world. Oh, jeez,
> let's not take this one any further for the moment. I'm not ready
> for that thread yet. : p
It would be interesting to figure out your wife's overleaves then do a
*non-channeled* relationship reading comparing your two charts. Just as you
don't need to channel to read an astrology or numerology chart, once you have
the overleaves (which you do *not* need to channel to figure out, if you do it
on your own or with someone who knows how to question you properly, e.g. the
Personality Puzzle quiz), you can make interesting fairly logical,
left-brained statements about how these two charts will interact.
Maybe you could be our guinea pig for that, you've been so great so far.
<G>
Your response to my interpretations of your situation based on your
overleaves (a fun experiment, which seems to have yielded some useful
information) has been very helpful. :)
Do you have Personality Puzzle among your collection of Michael books?
Kate
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 1997 02:55:32 -0400
Subject: Re: Artisans in Observation
Dave Gregg wrote:
> I'm a professional musician. I play
the clarinet, sax, and flute. I've
> also done a fair deal of teaching in the recent past. For awhile, I had
55
> private students each week. I'm a fairly versatile musician. I'm
naturally
> skilled at jazz improvisation on the sax, yet I'm equally comfortable
at filling
> the chair as a clarinetist in an orchestra. I truly love performing and
> studying music, and feel it's the best path for me in achieving direct
contact
> with essence.
Wow, that sounds like a neat lifestyle! :)
> Michael has told me through various
channelers that music has always
> been a strong focus in my previous past lives. In my most recent past
> incarnation I was told that I was a clarinetist with the Moscow
symphony, and there
> have been other lives where I did good work as a teacher of music.
Oddly
> enough, I feel that my essence is tiring of the music game and wants me
to move
> in other directions. I'm not certain what that path might be, but the
> nudge I feel is that its a branching off to other areas of creative
> expression. We'll see....
Are you artistic in the sense of painting and drawing? What about writing?
A lot of musicians seem to be gifted mathematically, too. :)
Kate
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 1997 02:49:14 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: INITIATION RITES
In a message dated 97-09-29 23:23:39 EDT, Gloria writes:
<< Of all the disgusting things you
slobbered all over the Michael List in
your welcome to Shepherd, which of course you merely used as a forum for
your own narcissistic belchings and pukings, you definitively crossed
the line with your mention of how to cook cats. When the shrieks are
over, and the pathetic scratchings too, huh? No, YOU'RE done. You've
gone too far this time, Dave. Were you waiting for someone to help you
with boundaries? I'll give you a few. >>
Dear Gloria :-)
I must say that I admire your passion. You sound like a very kind and
compassionate person, and your dedication to putting an end to the horrible
cruelties that are daily inflicted on our animal friends is quite commendable.
I apparently have triggered many unpleasant feelings regarding the abuse of
our feline pals, and I'm sorry you feel so much pain from what seems like a
wide spread epidemic of mistreatment all across the country. Indeed, it IS a
terrible injustice to creatures who essentially teach (so called humanity) one
of the most valuable lessons there is to learn -- unconditional love.
You'll be no doubt be surprised to learn that I used to live with a cat
myself. Thomas T. (pardon my painful lack of originality) was a beautiful
feline who possessed a sense of dignity that I have rarely encountered in even
most humans. Though, I was often puzzled by his avid interest in the myth that
cats have 9 lives. In fact, he frequently tested this theory, much to my
horror, by walking repeatedly into the electric fan. However, I never
questioned his higher motives and only assumed he was on a loftier plane than
the rest of us mere mortals. ;-p Seriously, he was a wonderful animal that
added immeasurable joy to my life, even though I loved to tease him
unmercifully.
These days I live with a terminally hyperactive poodle named Teddy. I am
convinced that she is my TASK COMPANION. ;-p You see, getting out of bed in
the morning has traditionally been a task that required the kind of heroic
determination I have always lacked. But fear no more, every morning like
clockwork, a blur of brown fur comes dashing into my room at a million times
the speed of light, and lands squarely on my chest with the collective force
of a thousand neutron bombs. But it doesn't end there. As I fall out of bed
and literally crawl the 10 feet to the bathroom, laboriously inching toward my
destination in order to promote one of my greatest achievements in life --
REGULARITY, this fiendish little fur-ball is tenaciously clinging to my head
like one of those face huggers from a sci-fi movie, and methodically drooling
generous supplies of doggy saliva deep into the inner labyrinth of my ear. Now
I could always get a less demanding pet, like a tarantula or a rattlesnake,
but I want you to know, I wouldn't trade my Teddy for the world.
Gloria, I don't fault you for tossing a pebble into my supposedly
narcissistic pond in order to publicly denounce me, but I must tell you that
after the ripples cease, my reflection will re-emerge, and I like the person I
see. Now I suppose that elements of my humor must be seen to be
"depreciated" at times, but I can't change what the universe
created, and I learned long ago that just because I fell out of step with the
rest of the band, didn't mean that the inherent rhythm of my strides were any
less important, just different.
On a positive note, perhaps your reaction to my odd comments unleashed the
life purpose you have been searching to find. Seriously, with your writing
talents and obviously excellent communication skills, you could be a champion
of leadership to assist in the prevention of cruelty to animals.
Best of wishes to you,
Dave :-)
P.S. - And now back to "Michael." Hey Shep, what are Michael's
views of 24 hours in a day/24 beers in a case -- mere coincidence? ;-p
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 1997 04:33:40 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: Artisans in Observation
In a message dated 97-09-30 02:47:44 EDT, Kate McMurry writes:
<< Are you artistic in the sense of
painting and drawing? What about
writing? A lot of musicians seem to be gifted mathematically, too. :)
Kate >>
No, 2+2 has always equaled 5 for me. Differential equations and the like
don't hold much future in my life, but differentially logical, now there's a
striking path. ;-p In terms of writing, I'd like to write poetry.
Dave
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 1997 07:56:05 -0600
From: Gloria Constantin
Subject: PUBLIC APOLOGY to WWQUINTNET/Dave
I was having some pretty bad abdominal pains and so was somewhat outside of
myself when I posted that tongue lashing.
The chief financial officer of our company, whose office is next to mine,
hates cats and daily talks about how he tortures strays and any neighbor's
cats that come into his yard. He laughs and shrieks as he tells his stories,
absolutely believing that everyone is enjoying them as much as he is. He talks
about what he did to them as a kid. He's even brought to work a small noose
which he claims he will use for hanging them. I've told him I don't want to
hear his jokes and shut my door, but it doesn't much deter him. He's also a
major asshole with respect to performing his duties, and understanding the
mechanisms of keeping a company public. I've had to cover his ass for the sake
of this company, and I'm currently wiping the ceo's stinking butt because he
got himself into an embarrassing and difficult situation. No, I'm not
volunteering for this. These particular tasks fall under my jurisdiction. (The
Butt-Wiper, I guess. The Fixer. The Mediator. The One who better get with the
Solution for their Fuck-Ups.) By the way, there is no lack of disrespect,
courtesy and consideration at this place. This company, under the leadership
of Fear and Greed, is rapidly consuming itself.
It's no excuse, Dave. No excuse. I was up all night with these terrible
pains and the knowledge that I was totally out of line writing that response,
wondering what in hell came over me. This doesn't help, but it wasn't about
you. All my sensitivities and agonies are worn these days on my face, my
sleeve, too apparent to anyone who really looks. They got triggered, and now I
feel as though I've irreparably damaged you.
Just this Saturday I was told my father, to whom I have not spoken for
nearly three years, (who made my childhood hell) could be dying, could be
dead. They didn't know. At the time he was being flown in a medical helicopter
to a hospital with the facilities to diagnose his condition and operate if
necessary. I was caught then. He had written to me a month earlier, begging me
to break my silence and asking my forgiveness for all the terrible things he
had done to me. I hadn't yet been able to bring myself to respond, to deal
with the whole of it and all the implications and agony of re-establishing
contact with him. Very early Sunday morning I learned he was out of danger. I
have not yet contacted him.
These experiences (and others) have drained me at all levels.
I have to leave, and it needs to be soon. I am faced with leaping off the
cliff. And it is a cliff because I have no cushion for a soft landing. This
will be a test of belief systems about the Universe that Provides (or doesn't)
and about messages that deliberately re-direct one to their proper and happy
place.
My posting that response indicates to me that I am operating at emotional
and psychological extremes these days. I see I've reached a limit of what I
can handle in real life, and I plastered those limitations like graffiti on
the List, and you were the wall I used to write on.
I ask your Forgiveness.
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 1997 08:56:07 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: A touching story... (fwd)
Ah, you guys gotta read this one...I heard it the first time last year when
I got to participate in doing this exercise with a group...it was wonderful.
:^) It is a valuable way to heal many wounds.... Thanks to Dave for forwarding
this.
Lori Tostado
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 1997 03:18:02 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: A touching story...
All the Good Things:
He was in the first third grade class I taught at Saint Mary's School in
Morris, Minn. All 34 of my students were dear to me, but Mark Eklund was one
in a million. Very neat in appearance, but had that happy-to-be-alive
attitude that made even his occasional mischievousness delightful. Mark
talked incessantly. I had to remind him again and again that talking without
permission was not acceptable. What impressed me so much, though, was his
sincere response every time I had to correct him for misbehaving -
"Thank you for correcting me, Sister!" I didn't know what to make
of it at first, but before long I became accustomed to hearing it many times
a day.
One morning my patience was growing thin when Mark talked once too often,
and then I made a novice-teacher's mistake. I looked at him and said,
"If you say one more word, I am going to tape your mouth shut!" It
wasn't ten seconds later when Chuck blurted out, "Mark is talking
again." I hadn't asked any of the students to help me watch Mark, but
since I had stated the punishment in front of the class, I had to act on it.
I remember the scene as if it had occurred this morning. I walked to my
desk, very deliberately opened my drawer and took out a roll of masking
tape. Without saying a word, I proceeded to Mark's desk, tore off two pieces
of tape and made a big X with them over his mouth. I then returned to the
front of the room. As I glanced at Mark to see how he was doing he winked at
me. That did it! I started laughing. The class cheered as I walked back to
Mark's desk, removed the tape and shrugged my shoulders. His first words
were, "Thank you for correcting me, Sister."
At the end of the year I was asked to teach junior-high math. The years
flew by, and before I knew it Mark was in my classroom again. He was more
handsome than ever and just as polite. Since he had to listen carefully to
my instructions in the "new math," he did not talk as much in
ninth grade as he had in the third. One Friday, things just didn't feel
right. We had worked hard on a new concept all week, and I sensed that the
students were frowning, frustrated with themselves - and edgy with one
another. I had to stop this crankiness before it got out of hand. So I asked
them to list the names of the other students in the room on two sheets of
paper, leaving a space between each name. Then I told them to think of the
nicest thing they could say about each of their classmates and write it
down. It took the remainder of the class period to finish the assignment,
and as the students left the room, each one handed me the papers. Charlie
smiled. Mark said, "Thank you for teaching me, Sister. Have a good
weekend." That Saturday, I wrote down the name of each student on a
separate sheet of paper, and I listed what everyone else had said about that
individual.
On Monday I gave each student his or her list. Before long, the entire
class was smiling. "Really?" I heard whispered. "I never knew
that meant anything to anyone!" "I didn't know others liked me so
much!" No one ever mentioned those papers in class again. I never knew
if they discussed them after class or with their parents, but it didn't
matter. The exercise had accomplished its purpose. The students were happy
with themselves and one another again. That group of students moved on.
Several years later, after I returned from vacation, my parents met me at
the airport. As we were driving home, Mother asked me the usual questions
about the trip - the weather, my experiences in general. There was a light
lull in the conversation. Mother gave Dad a side-ways glance and simply
says, "Dad?" My father cleared his throat as he usually did before
something important. "The Eklunds called last night," he began.
"Really?" I said. "I haven't heard from them in years. I
wonder how Mark is." Dad responded quietly. "Mark was killed in
Vietnam," he said. "The funeral is tomorrow, and his parents would
like it if you could attend." To this day I can still point to the
exact spot on I-494 where Dad told me about Mark.
I had never seen a serviceman in a military coffin before. Mark looked so
handsome, so mature. All I could think at that moment was, Mark, I would
give all the masking tape in the world if only you would talk to me. The
church was packed with Mark's friends.
Chuck's sister sang "The Battle Hymn of the Republic." Why did
it have to rain on the day of the funeral? It was difficult enough at the
grave side. The pastor said the usual prayers, and the bugler played taps.
One by one those who loved Mark took a last walk by the coffin and sprinkled
it with holy water. I was the last one to bless the coffin. As I stood
there, one of the soldiers who had acted as pallbearer came up to me.
"Were you Mark's math teacher?" he asked. I nodded as I continued
to stare at the coffin. "Mark talked about you a lot," he said.
After the funeral, most of Mark's former classmates headed to Chucks
farmhouse for lunch. Mark's mother and father were there, obviously waiting
for me. "We want to show you something," his father said, taking a
wallet out of his pocket. "They found this on Mark when he was killed.
We thought you might recognize it." Opening the billfold, he carefully
removed two worn pieces of notebook paper that had obviously been taped,
folded and refolded many times. I knew without looking that the papers were
the ones on which I had listed all the good things each of Mark's classmates
had said about him. "Thank you so much for doing that" Mark's
mother said. "As you can see, Mark treasured it." Mark's
classmates started to gather around us. Charlie smiled rather sheepishly and
said, "I still have my list. It's in the top drawer of my desk at
home." Chuck's wife said, "Chuck asked me to put this in our
wedding album." "I have mine too," Marilyn said. "It's
in my diary."
Then Vicki, another classmate, reached into her pocketbook, took out her
wallet and showed her worn and frazzled list to the group. "I carry
this with me at all times," Vicki said without batting an eyelash.
"I think we all saved our lists." That's when I finally sat down
and cried. I cried for Mark and for all his friends who would never see him
again.
THE END written by: Sister Helen P. Mrosia The purpose of this letter, is
to encourage everyone to compliment the people you love and care about. We
often tend to forget the importance of showing our affections and love.
Sometimes the smallest of things, could mean the most to another. I am
asking you, to please send this letter around and spread the message and
encouragement, to express your love and caring by complimenting and being
open with communication. The density of people in society, is so thick, that
we forget that life will end one day. And we don't know when that one day
will be. So please, I beg of you, to tell the people you love and care for,
that they are special and important. Tell them, before it is too late.
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 1997 09:54:51 +0000
Subject: Re: Scholars in Observation & Life Task
> It would be interesting to figure
out your wife's overleaves then do a
> *non-channeled* relationship reading comparing your two charts. Just
as
> you don't need to channel to read an astrology or numerology chart,
once
> you have the overleaves (which you do *not* need to channel to figure
> out, if you do it on your own or with someone who knows how to
question
> you properly, e.g. the Personality Puzzle quiz), you can make
> interesting fairly logical, left-brained statements about how these
two
> charts will interact.
We have both done the Meyers-Briggs thing (me - INTJ, her - ENTJ), and
astrologically, on a simplistic level we are compatible (me - Capricorn, her
- Taurus). I have not hit her with Michael yet, though. Guess now is a good
a time as any.
> Maybe you could be our guinea pig
for that, you've been so great so far. <G>
Oink!
> Your response to my interpretations
of your situation based on your
> overleaves (a fun experiment, which seems to have yielded some useful
> information) has been very helpful. :)
>
> Do you have Personality Puzzle among your collection of Michael
books?
No, but is this the same information that is posted on a couple of
Michael web sites? Lori's and Barbara's come immediately to mind.
John
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 1997 20:07:30 +0200
Subject: Re: INITIATION RITES
Hi Dave and all,
I'm glad you and Gloria have come to an understanding, Dave .
Katherine
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 1997
15:29:11 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: PUBLIC APOLOGY to WWQUINTNET/Dave
Gloria:
I have been lurking for quite
a while scimming through batches of
mail, deleting much material, saving even more. Your post came at
a time when I too feel the tension of stress pressing heavily upon me.
I wish I could make things easy for you and the whole episode simply
disappear. I can't.
Let me say, my loving thoughts
are with you. I will write again soon.
Blessed Be.
Lady Athena
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 1997 16:43:02 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: PUBLIC APOLOGY to WWQUINTNET/Dave
Gloria, there is no need to apologize. It was obvious from your anger that
my poor "attempt" at humor wasn't the sole catalyst of the pain you were harboring.
Sometimes to comprehend a nectar requires sorest need. Thus, perhaps, I was a
necessary trigger that finally allowed you to vent innumerable frustrations
that painfully cried out for expression. In any event, I am not offended or
even insulted by your words, and I will continue to believe that you are an
exceptionally compassionate person, who is just in need of some love and
understanding. Take care, and I wish you well. :-)
Your friend,
Dave
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 1997 17:22:14 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: Digest No. 1997-09-30 of Michael Teachings List
<< And now back to "Michael."
Hey Shep, what are Michael's views of 24
hours in a day/24 beers in a case -- mere coincidence? ;-p >>
I'm glad you asked that. Michael has spoken extensively on this subject. It
is no mere coincidence; au contraire, but this phenomenon did not occur in the
way one might think. It turns out that the 24-hour day was modeled AFTER the
24-beer case, not the other way around. This was done in order to help bring
balance and harmony into this planetary experiment. It should be mentioned
here that originally, beers came only in dark glass bottles and were much
larger. Also, they had no artificial flavorings or preservatives. Michael
explained that if we had a 25-hour day but a 24-beer case, earth's energies
would be out of synch, and we would be prone to terrible problems such as
pollution, war, and poverty....Wait a minute....I'll have to get back to you
on this.
Shepherd
P.S. Dave, when you mentioned that you felt yourself maybe pulling away
from music, I saw you painting a large canvas--for what it's worth.
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 1997 21:44:34 PDT
Subject: To Fear or Not To Fear
Namaste friends!
My name is Jasmine Zidaric; my spiritual name is Solara Ramana Ishtar Im*a.
I live and work in Montreal, Canada.
I have been reading you for a while, without making a sound.......so to
speak......... and found some of your exchanges most interesting. Thank you
all.......!
I am just a beginner in my explorations of the Michael material. If I can
overcome my instinctive disinclination to cultivating intellectual evaluation
and judgment rather than strengthening my connection with the intuitive wisdom
of the I AM Presence within..... I will be able to progress more rapidly. I
have difficulty in utilizing the process of categorization toward the goal of
enhanced seeing of Oneness in all.......!
However......... shall work on it...........!
and hopefully.........will get to keep up with all of you......
I wrote this short text on fear....... and even though you have not been
discussing this particular topic...... a part of me would like to share it
with you in the hope that it may serve you in some way......
I wish you all much light and love along the path of Greater Life!
Jasmine
Im*a
* * *
FEAR is the emotional response to the condition whereby the mind uses
thought in a way which is contrary to what one desires.
FEAR is a powerful creative pattern of consciousness; that which we fear,
we attract to ourselves. The stronger the fear...........the greater its
magnetic power....... the faster it will manifest in our experience.
Create what you want........ by dwelling on what you want and not by
dwelling on that which you do not want.......which creates fear.......!
When fear comes up, be with it........; take time to go deeply into the
core idea of it.........,. name the idea, then see the falsehood in it as
you consider it from the perspective of your Soul........
There will inevitably be a limiting thought at the heart of it that simply
is not true when considered from the spiritual perspective. Release that
thought........ RELEASE IT and replace it with another....... Replace it
with the one which is consistent with the higher truth, the one which is
high, and beautiful and validates the Truth of Your Being.
For you wear a face of the Creator......
........a creator-in-training......... remembering...........
remembering..............
For you are vast........ and beautiful....... and holy......... !
For you are indomitable..........
when you remember to create with love.......
when you remember to let go of fear.....
If those around you choose to be in fear, enlighten them........ then let
them be......
Honor yourself!
Choose!
Choose what you will think and how you will feel........
for thoughts and feelings are our chisels
with which we sculpt our reality.
Choose in accordance with your highest knowing.....
For your highest good..........
For the highest good of all........
* * *
Following is a quote from CONVERSATIONS WITH GOD by Neale Donald Walsch:
* "Fear is the energy which contracts, closes down, draws in, runs,
hides, hoards, harms.
Love is the energy which expands, opens up, sends out, stays, reveals, shares,
heals.
Fear wraps our bodies in clothing, love allows us to stand naked. Fear
clings to and clutches all that we have, love gives all that we have away.
Fear holds close, love holds dear. Fear grasps, love lets go. Fear rankles,
love soothes. Fear attacks, love amends.
Every human thought, word, or deed is based in one emotion or the other.
You have no choice about this, because there is nothing else from which to
choose. But you have free choice about which of these to select." *
* * *
May all your creations
bring back
love
to
u
In joy
Jasmine
Im*a
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 1997 22:31:51 -0700
Subject: Purpose and Wonderment
Dear fellow list members,
I have felt a tearing in my heart as I read some of the discussions, I've
felt their pain, and that of others, and my own, and it reminds me of
something that I've thought about for a long time, a question....One that Kate
addressed a while back when she said, "The road to hell is paved by good
intentions," which makes me wonder.... A class I took had us always
looking at what the results were, but never really addressed the
intentions.... What are good intentions really worth if they can't be
communicated as such to another? It takes a great amount of consciousness and
perception into the human condition to be able to see where people have good
intentions behind their actions which can seem perplexing and odd, if not
downright malicious, to others. This is one of the ways in which essence
learns its lessons. This is the major way in which karma is created--through
the results of good intentions. You can't get the lesson until you've been on
both sides, knowing how it really FEELS. Getting the emotional lesson is what
it's about.
Through our unconscious limiting beliefs, we create much of our daily
existence. These beliefs are based in the instinctive center, the core of
where all past/present/future lifetimes are stored. This is where the ego
stems from, the ego whose good intention is to protect the personality's
survival. The instinctive center, which resides mainly in the first chakra, is
a place where our subconscious stores our Shadow, that part of us we tend to
think is not us because it's either bad or icky or in some other way dreaded
and denied. The ego is a very simple being: it says, "If it hurts, don't
do it again!" Voila: a wall is built for protection. Pretty soon, after
many lifetimes of experience, there are so many walls, holding back the parts
of us that could get hurt, that we begin to suffocate. Our bodies tell us
so--with diseases and pain. The ego was just doing its job--and under its good
intentions, it kills the very thing it was trying to protect! You can't blame
the ego--this isn't about blame.
Getting conscious of our limiting beliefs that hold us back is a major
major point in getting the lesson. When our buttons get pushed, that is an
opportunity to consciously look at why we're having an emotional reaction to
something. Patterns that repeat themselves in our lives that lead to pain are
indicators of where we haven't integrated part of our shadows into ourselves.
"If you do what you've always done, you're going to get what you've
always gotten," is another message that comes to mind for me now. Using
emotions as indicators to see where we are at can be very healthy in the
journey of integrating the shadow and accepting all parts of ourselves, even
the fearful parts that have been holed up ever since the ego built that first
wall. These emotional parts often do not have words--they are not intellectual
and we don't always understand them, they are often very irrational. And that
is just the way they are meant to be.
Allowing these emotions to flow instead of fearing them and judging
yourself for having them is a lesson in letting go. People are so full of
emotions that have not run their course, that are dammed up inside, that they
have no room to see what's behind the actions of others that they don't
understand. There is so much pent-up anger and pain in this world these days,
it's almost like it takes soemthing of magnanomous proportions to give people
the "permission" within themselves to express their frustrations,
and they just explode....
Once you start working on your own core issues, you can never turn
back--your shadow will appear to you everywhere you look, looming ever larger
and more ominous the more it is denied or ignored. Taking responsibility for
that shadow--that part of you that you dread, integrating it and loving it as
a part of yourself no matter how terrible it may seem, gives you one
tremendous opportunity! To Choose Again. How is that for power? Make a new
choice--do something different than you've always done, forgive yourself and
others--and then, something different is going to happen. Count on it.
Pretty soon you'll be seeing the issues behind other people's behavior that
have really nothing to do with YOU, but you may be a trigger for their
process. Then, you get to do lots of major Discrimination: what's mine, and
what's somebody else's stuff. Now there is another huge task: just as you've
gotten conscious of your own stuff, now you get to figure out what's other
people's stuff being projected onto you, or what it is you've taken upon
yourself the responsibility for this other person's stuff. Keep in mind this
quote though, "It's never about the other person." (Except when it
is.) ;-) Most likely, most of the time, it is your stuff too. Don't let this
get you back into the blame game. Just take responsibility for what's yours,
be clear in where your boundaries and act within your integrity. Does it mean
that from then on all your good intentions will get you the results you're
after? Well, that's the risk inherent!
It takes a lot of courage to be willing to recognize where our egos have
put up walls and take responsibility and accountability for our actions based
on the fears that hold us back. It takes risk to love....even to love yourself
enough to be vulnerable, to allow yourself to take a chance that just perhaps,
love is the answer and the truth will set you free.....To allow yourself to be
all the divinity that you truly are inside, to shine.....to fly.....
Do we always share the gifts we have within us? Why not? I feel closer to
my destination, whatever it really is, whatever my life-task is (I am not sure
yet what it really is), when I share with others who I am inside. It is very
healing for me; for the good intent that I have inside to share, when it
reaches the right people, creates results I never would have imagined.
(Occasionally it backfires on me, but life goes on. It hurts too much to NOT
be myself, despite what my ego might tell me.)
What I would like to share more of, a gift that Michael showed me, is a
kind of energy/healing work that I do. To me, the Michael teachings have been
about spiritual growth and healing of the spirit--and in the channeling that I
have done, this is exactly what Michael has shown me to do--I can assist
others in accellerating their spiritual growth and healing through this energy
work I call the diamond integration--it is not an intellectual process like
most of the teachings. I'm hoping that at the Michael conference in November,
that we can do some kind of spiritual healing circle, or something along that
line. IMHO this is what Michael really wants us to get together for--to be
with our soul-family and collectively help each other with the lessons of
life, which are really more emotional and less intellectual. We get plenty of
the intellectual stuff through books, sessions, the 'net, etc.
Whew, should I have issued a "long post warning?" Heh, too late!
;-)
Love,
Lori
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 1997 13:39:44 -0700
Subject: To Gloria and Dave
To both of you: thank you! For being honest, sincere and understanding of
each other.
Barbara Taylor
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 1997 13:38:42 -0700
Subject: Re: The Personality Puzzle
John,
There is so much more in the books than is posted on the web sites. The
Personality Puzzle is different from any of the other books because it
explains how some of the overleaves work together and picture of how people
look with some of the traits.
The topic of physical signs of overleaves is a very complex one, not really
explained in that book or any of the others. I took an advanced class with
Jose where we spent a week learning how to "read" the physical signs
of overleaves.
Barbara Taylor
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 1997 16:56:42 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Entity characteristics
I was reading about certain commonalities that exist in specific entity
groups. In fact it's been discussed that some entities have an abrasive and
aggressive quality, while others favor more gentle qualities in their overall
characteristics. Of course, I'm now curious if anyone has compiled any
information that might detail the general qualities of the more popular
entities.
I have not absorbed much information concerning cadres and entities yet,
but was told by one channeler that I was from the 5th entity. Unfortunately, I
don't know which cadre this is from.
Dave - probably just the 5th peanut in a Snickers bar.
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 1997 19:32:56 -0400 (EDT)
From: "RAVINAMK"
Subject: re:Entity characteristics
In the long run, does it even matter to which entity, cadre, etc. one
belongs? This material is new to me, and while I enjoy reading about the
overleaves to gain insight into my personal relationships, the significance of
the castings seems only to be divisive.
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 1997
20:23:52 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: Entity characteristics
In a message dated 97-10-01
19:35:35 EDT, RAVINAMK writes:
<< In the long run,
does it even matter to which entity, cadre, etc. one belongs? This material is
new to me, and while I enjoy reading about the overleaves to gain insight into
my personal relationships, the significance of the castings seems only to be
devisive. >>
Does it matter in terms of
how I think of myself, or who I associate with?
No...
My interest is merely out of curiosity.
Dave
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 1997 18:27:40 -0700
Subject: re: Oneness
Hi Jasmine, Dave and everyone,
In response to some of the comments at the beginning of Jasmine's post, and
then again mentioned regarding the difference in entities...I think that it's
a common feeling to believe that seeing our uniqueness somehow takes away from
our oneness.
Our body is one, yet it has many types of cells which make it up and build
to create its strength and versatility. Noticing the differences is
discernment, not judgement. It's saying there are differences between skin
cells and stomach cells, not that one is better or more important. Which would
you do without? All are needed and valuable, different yet part of the whole.
Appreciating, honoring our unique differences as well as how they come
together in oneness perhaps encourages the freedom for us to truly be
ourselves. To be in professions that use our unique gifts and talents in ways
that make use of who we are in ways that suit us and add to the benefit of
everyone--is hopefully the kind of fullfillment we are moving towards.
Regarding the
entities....
I am fascinated by this information. Meeting with at least one member of my
entity in person clearly showed me that some of the traits I had been
wrestling with as long as I could remember were not just _me_ but ran deeper
than this particular personality or current life or person. Learning that
gentleness or abrasiveness runs in your entity is another bit of information
that can help in being more accepting and understanding of ourselves. For me,
all the information I've discovered along those lines has only been freeing.
It has also brought me in contact with people I feel a lot in common with,
which has been a great pleasure.
I would enjoying hearing more about the natures of entities. Not in any way
with intent to divide, just to appreciate and free ourselves to be ourselves.
Best to all,
Brin
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 1997 02:14:15 -0400
Subject: Re: The Personality Puzzle
Barbara Taylor wrote:
> The topic of physical signs of
overleaves is a very complex one, not
> really explained in that book or any of the others. I took an advanced
> class with Jose where we spent a week learning how to "read"
the
> physical signs of overleaves.
Do you mean by "physical signs" body language? Has Jose done a
tape or tapes of that information?
Kate
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 1997 00:56:50 -0700
Subject: on sharing
Hi everyone,
I just wrote a note of clarification to Ravi which I'll share here....I've
been touched by so many of the recent sharings and exchanges. Perhaps
especially by our attempts to share, our misunderstandings, our efforts to
reach out through computer words and share warmth, concepts, play, and
companionship. It's a challenge for our humanness, our hopes, our
vulnerability, our wisdom to clearly come across on a two dimensional screen,
but so much richness comes from our sharing here. Perhaps as we continue, we
can come to a deeper understanding here, that harm is rarely intended.
Sometimes things may come out awkwardly...if we were simply conversing someone
could just ask what was meant and that would be that. Appreciation to everyone
for their sharings and all our efforts to share,
Best to everyone, Brin
Dear Ravi, ( is this right?)
My intent certainly wasn't meant to shut you up, rather my hope is to
continue to share with people how we are inter-related and also that it is
ok to use this material to learn more about our uniqueness.
I think sometimes it is a challenge to share our view points in writing
in ways that are simply ok. What I mean is that because it is computer
writing, you can't see the warmth in my face or the invitation in my being
to share of your own. Words this way can seem stronger sometimes than they
are meant, so let me say that I just didn't want to see potential
information on the entities held back. It has been so wonderful to learn
more about these families of people. It in no way is meant to exclude you.
I look forward to your continued sharing and hope that it can be ok if we
express different views and perhaps through our expression, learn more about
and from one another.
Best to you,
Brin
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 1997 09:23:27 -0700
Subject: Re: Physical Attributes of the Overleaves
> Do you mean by "physical
signs" body language? Has Jose done a tape or
> tapes of that information?
Kate,
No there's no tape. You have see them.
I wouldn't call it body language, as such, but physical clues about the
various overleaves. For example,
priests carry energy in their eyes,
sages in
their throat.
To use the clues, you have to know what they are, watch for visual signs, then
learn how to "feel" their personality. Like I said, we spent an
entire week-long class on this subject. Can't explain it in a few words.
Barbara Taylor
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 1997
09:28:03 -0700
Subject: Re: Entity influences
The experienced channels can
recognize the various entities.
Each entity has a common
theme and common similarities. It's part of what they agree to do as a group.
If you get a bunch of folks in the same entity together, they will usually
discover common threads.
Entity designation or any
other Michael information is only meant to learn to accept ourselves and to
accept others.
Barbara Taylor
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 1997 12:53:34 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: Entity influences
In a message dated 97-10-02 12:35:23 EDT, Barbara Taylor writes:
<< Each entity has a common theme and
common similarities. It's part of
what they agree to do as a group. If you get a bunch of folks in the
same entity together, they will usually discover common threads. >>
Well, what are the common threads? Surely someone has done some research on
this out of just a mild case of curiosity.
Dave - really just wants to point and laugh at the other entities'
idiosyncrasies. ;-p
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 1997 12:13:01 -0700
Subject: Re: Entity influences
Emily Baumbach has an excellent (IMHO) tape on Entities and Cadres. I found
it very interesting and informative - as well as fun! The Entities do have
common threads and she talks about them in depth (for instance, there is the
service entity, the teddy bear entity, the Pee Wee Herman entity, etc.)
I, for one, generally feel very at ease with Entity mates when I meet them.
We seem to have similar outlooks. And then there are celebrities whom I've
always felt a resonance with and it often turns out that we are either Entity
mates or are in the same Entity number, different Cadres (in my case it's the
7th Entity, and some of my Entity buds are Ellen DeGeneres, Melissa Etheridge,
kd lang & Julia Roberts.)
-Janet
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 1997 15:21:18 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: Digest No. 1997-10-02 of Michael Teachings List
<< The topic of physical signs of
overleaves is a very complex one. >>
There's a short subchapter "How Roles Appear Physically and
Energetically" on page 119 of my book "The Journey of Your Soul--A
Channel Explores Channeling and the Michael Teachings." There are also a
few comments about how other overleaves look elsewhere in the book. Jose, I
understand, has a marvelous slide show illustrating the overleaves. I'm sure
he has much more information than I do about that, and maybe someday he'll put
it into an expanded version of the "Personality Puzzle" or
elsewhere. I find that physical cues aren't foolproof but can aid validation.
Best,
Shepherd
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 1997 14:26:32 -0400
Subject: Re[2]: Entity influences
Janet wrote:
And then there are celebrities whom I've
always felt a resonance with and it
often turns out that we are either Entity mates or are in the same Entity
number, different Cadres (in my case it's the 7th Entity, and some of my
Entity
buds are Ellen DeGeneres, Melissa Etheridge, kd lang & Julia Roberts.)
-------------------------------------------------------------
What is the significance of "7th Entity"?
Also, speaking of the celebrities you resonate with, are they often in your
dreams? There are celebrities that feel close to and dream of them over and
over again in different scenarios. It's always the same 3 or 4.
Love and Light,
Lorraine
a.k.a. The Goddess
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 1997 18:16:22 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: Entity characteristics
<<< Also, speaking of the
celebrities you resonate with, are they often in your
dreams? There are celebrities that I feel close to and dream of them over
and over again in different scenarios. It's always the same 3 or 4.
Love and Light,
Lorraine
a.k.a. The Goddess >>>
Dear Goddess
Ah, and what feasts of imagination those scenarios must be. ;-p BTW, have
your dreams been rated PG-13, or something slightly higher? Not that I'm
probing, mind you, but you see, this bored Artisan has all this clay and
doesn't know what to sculpt.
Dave - Life is just a bed of "ruses." ;-p (author of "101
Ways to Love Your Cat So Much It Says "ENOUGH ALREADY!")
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 1997 05:37:21 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: Entity influences
In a message dated 97-10-03 04:28:57 EDT, Janet Botto writes:
<< Emily Baumbach has an excellent (IMHO)
tape on Entities and Cadres.
I found it very interesting and informative - as well as fun! The Entities
do have
common threads and she talks about them in depth (for instance, there is the
service
entity, the teddy bear entity, the Pee Wee Herman entity, etc.) >>
Oh, if there is a God, please don't put me in the Pee Wee Herman entity.
;-p
Anyhow, does this mean that I have to purchase another book or tape in
order to acquire this information? I just got back from Barnes & Noble
with even more Michael books and it looks like I'll have to empty my wallet
some more. Gee, I'm beginning to think that if you give Michael a free hand,
he'll stick it in your pocket. ;-p Is there a Swiss bank account lurking among
those 1050 fragments? Getting free information seems as easy as trying to
catch a wet fish. ;-p
OK, I'd like to announce that I've discovered the cure for the kennel
cough. If you just purchase all my books and tapes, perhaps we can arrange a
private consultation. Uh, in about 10 years, and only if you frequently push
the button on my elevator shoes. ;-p
Dave - A Pain in the Ass, and I don't even advocate bending over for the
bar of soap. (author of "Spiritual Capitalism in the year 2000)
Date: Fri, 03 Oct 1997 09:00:57 -0400
Subject: Wisdom
Thought for Today:
"There are plenty of fools in the world; but if they had not been sent
for some wise purpose, they wouldn't have been here; and since they are here
they have as good a right to have elbow-room in the world as the
wisest." Susan Edmonstone Ferrier, Scottish novelist (1782-1854).
--
Peace and Light to You and Yours,
Kenneth Broom, Columbia, MD, USA
aka I.A.M. Research
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
7th Level Old Scholar, Observation, Acceptance, Idealist,
Emotional Part of Intellectual Center, Impatience. (INFP)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 1997 09:29:57 -0400
Subject: Re[2]: Entity characteristics
Dave wrote:
Dear Goddess
Ah, and what feasts of imagination those scenarios must be. ;-p BTW,
have your dreams been rated PG-13, or something slightly higher? Not
that I'm probing, mind you, but you see, this bored Artisan has all
this clay and doesn't know what to sculpt.
Dave - Life is just a bed of "ruses." ;-p
(author of "101 Ways to Love Your Cat So Much It Says "ENOUGH
ALREADY!")
Dave, you old voyeur you!! As a matter of fact there have been a few dreams
you could classify as "slightly higher". Let's see, it's always
either Kevin Bacon, James Spader, or Keifer Sutherland. But you know, one
dream I had involved K. Sutherland as my lover/soul mate. He was a criminal
and had robbed a bank. We stood in front of this bank together. He had on a
long duster coat and a rifle and cowboy boots. There was a pained and sad look
on his face. I knew in my dream that he was about to be killed. I stood in
front of him and hugged him and the feeling I came away with in that dream was
incredible. It was if we were living out some bittersweet connectedness from
another time. I'll never forget that feeling.
Anyone else out there into dreams? I've been studying it for a while and
truly believe our dreams are very powerful lessons, messages, plays from the
past, etc.
Anyway, Dave, hope this sparks a little motivation for ya'. I'll keep ya'
posted on any dreams I think you might be interested in (amused by)!.
Love to All,
The Goddess (LL)
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 1997 09:28:49 +0000
Subject: Re: Entity influences
> Anyhow, does this mean that I have to
purchase another book or tape in order
> to acquire this information? I just got back from Barnes & Noble
with even
> more Michael books and it looks like I'll have to empty my wallet some
more.
> Gee, I'm beginning to think that if you give Michael a free hand, he'll
stick
> it in your pocket. ;-p Is there a Swiss bank account lurking among
those
> 1050 fragments? Getting free information seems as easy as trying to
catch a
> wet fish. ;-p
Hmm, we could go back to a Ramthaism on this one. If you want the
information bad enough you will figure out how to manifest enough money to get
it. Or you could channel (or make up) your own material, and sell your own
books and tapes and videos and readings and workshops and ... Start your own
cult! JZ Knight has a really swank place by the way, and at least one Rolls
Royce in addition to her many other vehicles.
> OK, I'd like to announce that I've
discovered the cure for the kennel cough.
> If you just purchase all my books and tapes, perhaps we can arrange a
private
> consultation. Uh, in about 10 years, and only if you frequently push the
> button on my elevator shoes. ;-p
How about a method for resurrecting kitties that have used all nine of
their lives? (Only Dave can teach this one) You will need attend seven seven
minute classes a month at seven p.m. for seven years, at the low low price of
seven dollars per minute.
> Dave - A Pain in the Ass, and I don't
even advocate bending over for the bar
> of soap.
How about the powdered soap? And don't forget the hamsters!
John
Date: Fri, 03 Oct 1997 21:15:52 -0700
Subject: Re: Re[2]: Entity influences
On Thu, 2 Oct 97, Lorraine wrote:
> Janet wrote:
>
>
> And then there are celebrities whom I've always felt a resonance with
and it
> often turns out that we are either Entity mates or are in the same
Entity
> number, different Cadres (in my case it's the 7th Entity, and some of
my Entity
> buds are Ellen DeGeneres, Melissa Etheridge, kd lang & Julia
Roberts.)
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> What is the significance of "7th Entity"?
By "7th Entity" I mean that I am in the 7th Entity of Cadre 1 (or
Cadre 3 in Shepherd's system.) The 7th Entity is known as the
"service" Entity (though perhaps it should be known as the
"Famous Lesbian" Entity!) and generally acts as a nice, friendly
bridge to the next Cadre.
Each Cadre has 7 Entities, each Entity has around 1000 essences - Michael
is a reunited Entity. I forget what Michael's Entity number is in their Cadre,
but I would think that it is 1st or 2nd.
So, the gist is that, regardless of what Cadre they're in, each 1st Entity
is the "trailblazing" Entity, each 5th is the "teddy Bear"
Entity, each 7th is the "service" Entity, etc. Is there a Sage
(Shepherd!) who can state this better than I can?
> Also, speaking of the celebrities you
resonate with, are they often in your
> dreams? There are celebrities that feel close to and dream of them over
and
> over again in different scenarios. It's always the same 3 or 4.
> Love and Light,
> Lorraine
> a.k.a. The Goddess
I don't dream about my celebrity Entity mates, but I do dream about my
friends who are Entity mates (quite often). There are other celebrities that I
dream about regularly who are not Entity mates, but with whom I believe I have
some connection - past life, etc. There is one actress in particular (Kate
Mulgrew), whose career I've followed from her very first TV job 20 years ago,
with whom I've shared past lives. I resonated with her from the first moment I
saw her - she felt like an old friend. It's only in the last several years
that I've gained an understanding of why I feel I know her.
Peace all,
Janet
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 1997 12:56:10 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: Digest No. 1997-10-04 of Michael Teachings List
> So, the gist is that, regardless of
what Cadre they're in, each 1st > Entity is the "trailblazing"
Entity, each 5th is the "teddy Bear" > Entity, each 7th is the
"service" Entity, etc. Is there a Sage > (Shepherd!) who can
state this better than I can?
This is news to me. First entities do tend to trailblaze, especially when
they're also first in their cadre group (first of 84 entities). But I'd never
heard the idea that, for example, every 7th entity is about service, although
they do tend to provide links to other cadres. I'll have to think about
members of 5th entities of other cadres I know and see if they look
teddy-bearish. My father is in 4/5 (my system); I don't see him as
teddy-bearish, but maybe others do. What do they say about second entities
(I'm in a second entity)?
Shepherd
Date: Sat, 04 Oct 1997 15:30:02 -0700
Subject: Re: Digest No. 1997-10-04 / Entities
On Sat, 4 Oct 97, Shepherd wrote:
> (Janet wrote)
>> So, the gist is that, regardless of what Cadre they're in, each 1st
>> Entity is the "trailblazing" Entity, each 5th is the
"teddy Bear"
>> Entity, each 7th is the "service" Entity, etc. Is there a
Sage
>> (Shepherd!) who can state this better than I can?
>
> This is news to me. First entities do tend to trailblaze, especially
when
> they're also first in their cadre group (first of 84 entities). But I'd
never
> heard the idea that, for example, every 7th entity is about service,
although
> they do tend to provide links to other cadres. I'll have to think about
> members of 5th entities of other cadres I know and see if they look
> teddy-bearish. My father is in 4/5 (my system); I don't see him as
> teddy-bearish, but maybe others do. What do they say about second
entities
> (I'm in a second entity)?
>
> Shepherd
Most of this information comes from Emily's tape and newsletters, I believe
(possibly from JP as well? - I have a HORRIBLE memory :-/ ) I've re listened
to Emily's tape, because it gives the most info (a lot of the celebrity info.
on the tape was channeled by Joya Pope.) The 5th (Teddy Bear or Walt Disney)
Entity includes people like Robin Williams, George Lucas, Steven Spielberg,
Kenneth Branagh. They don't have to look teddy bearish, but are usually cuddly
in some way. I also have a friend in the 5th who isn't "teddy
bearish" - these are just some general characteristics and certainly not
everyone fits into the same mold. "5's" tend to be about bringing
fun into the space.
As far as all Entities of the same number having the same "feel",
yeah - in fact Michael said on that tape that when you are wanting to meet
people with whom you're likely to feel a resonance, don't worry about whether
or not you are "really" in the same Entity of the same Cadre, it's
the Entity number that counts. They said that some Michael people may feel
left out if they don't happen to come from the 1st or 2nd Cadre (like most
Michael students do) - but that's really no big deal. We can feel a similarity
to anyone from the same Entity number and that is what's important.
The second Entity is the Entity that comes in after the pioneers have set
things up in some area and then make it more fun, humanize it. They tend to be
expressive, with a "Libra-like Artisan and Sage quality". They are
entertainers, great party-goers, have good social skills. Some famous two's
are Robert Redford, Madonna, Marilyn Monroe, Billy Crystal, Elizabeth Taylor,
Werner Erhard (sp?), Dennis Rodman, Candice Bergen, Luciano Pavarotti, Diana
Ross and Rajneesh. My husband Rob is also in the 2nd and he certainly has
those characteristics.
Hope that helps!
Take care all,
Janet
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 1997 19:01:21 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: Digest No. 1997-10-04 / Entities
In a message dated 97-10-04 18:31:50 EDT, Janet Botto writes:
<< Hope that helps! >>
Thanks, Janet. Finally someone provided more detailed information. Funny
enough, I'm in the 5th entity, and I've been called a "Teddy-bear"
all my life. ;-p This is very amusing. :-)
Dave
Date: Sun, 05 Oct 1997 05:06:41 -0400
Subject: Myers Briggs on the Web
For those who are interested:
A interesting explanation of the Keirsey can be found at The Keirsey
Temperament Web Site at http://keirsey.com/
---
Peace and Light to You and Yours,
Kenneth Broom, Columbia, MD, USA
aka I.A.M. Research
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
7th Level Old Scholar, Observation, Acceptance, Idealist,
Emotional Part of Intellectual Center, Impatience. (INFP)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 1997 15:02:45 +0000
Subject: Introduction * Entity characteristics
Hallo! fellow Members of the Michael-teaching list!!
My name is Jon Bjarni, I'm from Iceland and live there. I've been teaching
the Michael-teachings for some time and will start a new beginners class
oct.14.
My Overleaves are; 3. level Old Priest whith
goal of Growth,
Idealist
attitude, chief feature (Dragon) of
Self-deprecation, in
Reserved mode and
Intellectual centered
I've been a silent member for some time and I have to say that it is very
refreshing to see differences solved vhith love and understanding instead of
fear and competiveness (infuence from the Dragons/Chief Feature)
I want to thank Ed Hamerstrom for very educative letters and you all for
sharing your thoughts and opinion.
Illusion af the
old soul is that entity, cadre, spirit and those things
matter the most. I think that it is our live here and now that matter most,
spirit, soul and all that does of course matter a great deal, but it comes in
second.
Have any of any of you been working on your Dragon? How do you perform your
work on them? What gives you the best results?
I am planning to give an advanced class in in the Michael-teachings and
emphasis on working the Dragon
All the best and my love too!
Jon Bjarni
(Human Resources)
Date: Sun, 05 Oct 1997 09:59:32 -0700
Subject: Re: Free Information
Dave,
If you want free information, go to the library, not Barnes & Noble.
Barbara Taylor
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 1997
14:21:32 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: Free Information
In a message dated 97-10-05
13:05:45 EDT, Barbara Taylor writes:
<< Dave,
If you want free information, go to the library, not Barnes & Noble.
>>
Oh, Barbara...you crack me
up. ;-p
Dave
Date: Sun, 05 Oct 1997 14:53:52 -0400
Subject: Dragons
Jon Bjarni Bjarnason wrote:
[clipped]
> Have any of any of you been working on
your Dragon? How do you perform your
> work on them? What gives you the best results?
Dear Jon,
I have a chief feature/dragon of "Impatience".
1) My first work with impatience was to just be aware of when I was being
impatient and especially when I was in the negative pole which is intolerance.
2) The second step is to try to stay in the positive pole which is
audacity.
3) The third step is to give the gift of "Patience" to my loved
ones and to the whole world.
[clipped]
-- Peace and Light to You and Yours,
Kenneth Broom, Columbia, MD, USA
aka I.A.M. Research
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
7th Level Old Scholar, Observation, Acceptance, Idealist,
Emotional Part of Intellectual Center, Impatience. (INFP)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 1997 22:02:50 +0200
Subject: RE: Digest No. 1997-09-30 of Michael Teachings List
Hi Shepherd and Agape,
Hello!
I'm new to the list, and happy to be aboard. I'm going to try to look at
the archives. Good to have your input - we thrive on your book out here in
South Africa despite the difficulties of getting copies!!! Don't pity us in
"darkest Africa" we are creating the light little by little!!
Lots of love,
Gay
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 1997 18:51:31 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Pee wee entity
Dave said
<< Oh, if there is a God, please
don't put me in the Pee Wee Herman entity. ;-p
Anyhow, does this mean that I have to purchase another book or tape in order
to acquire this information? I just got back from Barnes & Noble with
even
more Michael books and it looks like I'll have to empty my wallet some more.
Gee, I'm beginning to think that if you give Michael a free hand, he'll
stick
it in your pocket. ;-p Is there a Swiss bank account lurking among those
1050 fragments? >>
Dave, you sound just as delightfully quirky as most of my friends in the
Pee Wee entity, mostly scholars in this third entity of Whatever cadre it is
getting called these days. Kay Kamala is in it, a ton of San Fran people and
my lovely server husband.
I think that Shepherd in his book Journey of your soul has a bunch of stuff on
this. emily's tapes are always lots of fun tho. Think she might be in there
too. Seems to me you'd feel right uncomfortable in a straight conservative
entity!!
Joya Pope
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 1997 23:57:26 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: Digest No. 1997-10-05 of Michael Teachings List
Thanks, Janet.
> a lot of the celebrity info. on the
tape was channeled by Joya Pope
My understanding is that Joya compiled the celebrity entity lists in the
80s mostly from JP's channeling.
I write in my book "The Journey of Your Soul" about how I tend to
draw a lot of clients from number two entities of other cadres as well as my
own; there is a resonance. However, I feel more soul connection with those who
are actually in my own cadre/entity.
I can see all number 5 entities, for example, sharing a
"five-ness," but each entity also has its own
"personality" based on its particular composition and goals. A 5
entity with lots of warriors will look different from a 5 entity with lots of
artisans.
Best,
Shepherd
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 1997 00:23:48 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: Pee wee entity
In a message dated 97-10-05 18:52:35 EDT, Joya Pope writes:
<< Dave, you sound just as delightfully
quirky as most of my friends in the Pee
Wee entity, mostly scholars in this third entity of Whatever cadre it is
getting called thiese days. Kay Kamala is in it, a ton of San Fran people
and my lovely server husband.
I think that Shepherd in his book Journey of your soul has a bunch of stuff
on this. emily's tapes are always lots of fun tho. Think she might be in
there too. Seems to me you'd feel right uncomfortable in a straight
conservative entity!!
Joya >>
Are you suggesting that I should jump ship and join the 3rd entity? Hmmmm...
It does seem that some of my 5th entity friends have become rather tiresome as
of late. I mean, give them an inch and they measure it. ;-p
Thanks about the tip concerning Shepherd's fine volume, I'll carefully peruse
it's salient passages. Though, if you ever feel the need for unbridled
adventure, may I suggest downloading his 25, 000 meg brochure. Some
perspicacious minded folks have even heralded it as the 9th Wonder of the
World! In fact, I can personally attest that I felt like a 14th century
navigator bound for a new land when I finally explored its sandy shores. ;-p
What a read! Just kidding, Shepherd.
BTW, Joya. I always thought your name would be perfect for a TV talk show.
I can hear the announcer: "Ladies and Gentlemen, Ms Joya Pope." ;-p
Dave - Quirky Artisan who just ADORES cats! :)
Next Page | 1997/40
.....................................................................................................................................
Michael
Teachings |
Site Map |
Welcome |
Introduction |
Michael FAQ |
Soul Age |
Roles |
Overleaves |
Advanced Topics |
Nine Needs |
Michael Channeling |
Related Articles |
Channels & Resources |
Michael Tools |
Michael Books |
Michael Chat |
Michael Student Database
|
Role Photos |
Spiritweb List Archives |
Personality Profile |
Translations |
Glossary |
Links |
|