|
Related Articles > Spiritweb Michael Spiritweb
Michael List
THE POSTS:
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 1998 01:35:09 -0500 Jody B wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
Hi Jody, Don't know much about magnetic kings, but I hear that it's hard for them to wear watches. John M Date: Mon, 27 Apr 1998 16:38:25 -0700 John, That's about as bad as the question that has stumped me all my life.... How can there possibly be a "never ends" of all that is? I understand all the exactness and the walls that this physical plane helps to create. What I cannot comprehend is that which goes on forever.... Where are the walls to the universe....?? So much that I can not remember yet....sigh Hugs (just because)
> As much as all this makes sense to me, I still have some problems with the big
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 1998 17:31:54 -0700 JJ, I think you and I take this teaching very much the same way but then maybe that's our take as Sages...:-) I enjoyed reading your thoughts and ideas on this topic of discrepancies. I basically feel that what ever resonates with me is the best I can come up with at this time. It will be a never ending game of validation, validation, validation....:) Hugs,
> < the rest snipped>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 1998 19:58:03 -0700 (PDT)
>As much as all this makes sense to me, I still have some problems with the big
That reminds me, Date: Tue, 28 Apr 1998 01:59:16 EDT Hi everyone, Michael has said on more than one occasion that the only part of the overleaves that we can change during a lifetime are the Chief Features. And just when we got used to them, then they get sneaky on us and do a switch! I say go figure:) I think that its important that we remain open and flexible with these teachings, but not to the point of losing sight of the core teachings. Personally, Im not much for parallel lives and walk-ins because I have observed lots of folks getting caught up in the mystery and drama of thoseconcepts,only to avoid what their work is here on the physical plane. All is chosen- we all end up at the end of the line eventually:P And as one now infamous Michael channel said, "after we die, we all go to the Acucheck Bardo station and get our correct overleaves!" Also, about the Magnetic Kings: in a session this last weekend, they said through SC that there are now 300 plus MOKings incarnate at this time. That's certainly more than the 50plus mentioned in MMFM don't you think? best regards, Victoria Marina. AMT channel Date: Tue, 28 Apr 1998 01:14:02 -0700 Kenneth,
/ Dick Hein wrote:
As mentioned in my response to Barry, your number of 1481 resolves to
4/2/31=3 which gives you a Scholar/Artisan/Warrior influence (assuming standard
structure of cadence groupings). Does that resonate better than Server/Sage/Sage
which came from 225? Cheers, Date: Tue, 28 Apr 1998 05:17:45 -0500 Jody B wrote:
> I get no respect! I ask about my entity, I'm told it's "pound puppies." I ask
Jody, I really didn't mean any harm in my joke and I hope you didn't take that personally. As a light hearted sage, I can focus on the humor sometimes without being as sensitive as might be wise. Recently, I had heard that magnetic kings are 6th level old kings and have a particular task and talant in drawing people to them with certain agreements. These kings are supposedly very rare and there's presently only a handful of them incarnated presently. The not able to wear watches comment is strickly my speculation. John M Date: Tue, 28 Apr 1998 08:43:11 -0400 Dick Hein wrote:
> Kenneth wrote:
The Scholar/Artisan/Warrior influence (4/2/3) resonates much more strongly than the Server/Sage/Sage influence (1/5/5). I expect that is why the latter numbers felt useless to me even tho' I channeled them. And I use the word "useless" to mean "not having much value" rather than "being incorrect". The 1/5/5 numbers are the results of the Akashic trying accomodate itself to my uninformed questioning. per Michael: (not quoted) My Primary Cadence is in the Artisan Position of my Greater Cadence. My Essence is in the 1,481st Position of my Entity. A much more powerful system of numbers for me is 4/2/1481=4, which gives me a Scholar/Artisan/Scholar influence. This has an even greater resonance than the 4/2/31=3 notation, due primarily to the following: "Greater Cadence" has little meaning within an Entity, but is a useful means of describing the group of fragments that may have a very important effect on a fragment's life during an incarnation cycle. They are the pool from which the Quadrates, Septates, and other groupings may be drawn. ET's and TC's are also part of the Greater Cadence. And... each fragment is part of the Greater Cadence of each member of her/his Greater Cadence. The position numbers seem to be just influences/imprintings acting upon the Essences. Any Essence may occupy any entity position. There are other considerations(sic) regarding Entity Organization that have not been discussed yet, and will be discussed when we Michael Students can perceive them. Continue asking questions. Just as a reminder: in order for there to be an entity mate relationship there must also be an equality of both fragments' Cadre Hierarchy from Entity thru Cadre and up through the Greater Cadre Groups all the way up to the TAO. Having the same Cadre and Entity numbers does not necessarily make for Entity Mates. JJ Tan mentioned this in a private post to me. Michael suggests that fragments validate their relationships through their own inner knowings and feelings. These are much more telling than Cadre and Entity relationship numbers due to their immediacy in the Here and Now. Peace and Light to You and Yours, Date: Tue, 28 Apr 1998 08:53:27 EDT
That's about as bad as the question that has stumped me all my life.... How
To the ants in my kitchen,the universe of the kitchen has no end,its sooo big
they cant comprehend the concept. Date: Tue, 28 Apr 1998 08:40:17 -0500 Victoria wrote: (Snip)
> Personally, Im not much for parallel lives and walk-ins because I
I thank you and I completely concur with your opinion of playing games with theories and ideas that, while fascinating, deter one from the Life Task. (Snip)
> Also, about the Magnetic Kings: in a session this last weekend, they said
I was misunderstood regarding my comments about Magnetic Kings. I said I thought I had found the King who would be my magnetic king when the time came. She is not yet a magnetic king, but I "believe" she will be when "cycle off" time comes for me. My apologies to Jody for the misunderstanding. Jeanne Date: Tue, 28 Apr 1998 07:24:12 PDT Hi David T Date: Tue, 28 Apr 1998 09:31:27 -0700 Here's a little something for the bit of Spiritualist attitude and
Perseverance mode within us all, that I hope you enjoy!
Limitations
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 1998 15:33:56 EDT I myself like the concept of micro/macro...you know, not necessarily ends but everything within itself over and over. I guess I would imagine it would end by beginning very small again...the, what is that...uburos? snake eating it's own tail? And then that snake is just one of many other snakes doing the same thing? To get beyond the whole cycle stuff, I imagine it must be jumping to a whole different level. Which is also a part (together with ours) of something else. So maybe it doesn't end! But that's why some of this cadre system stuff makes sense to me. BUT it is a bit distressing if I try to imagine myself now as a cell in a body, and then stop to think about how much of an individual my cells are...help! If my feelings are like that of a cell...well, guess that's just an issue of being too wrapped up in the ego, huh? Okay, well, anyways, (seems that I'm getting a lot of extra et artisan attention and am writing in a rather scattered way -- sorry!) something about the eastern ideas of maya (that's it, isn't it?)...where everything is an illusion...I bet that's true about the whole cyclical system too. All a matter of perspective. I'm just gonna work on finding those truths and laws that are always there in everything, 'cause I think I would get lost very easily trying to see everything "out there" and above. So, I guess this does apply (at least for me) to the Michael system, because no one is really "wrong"...we're all just worked into different places within the system, and have different viewpoints. Someone on the tiniest level is really no farther than someone on the highest/grandest. Same rules apply, in essence. What is essential. Okay, that's enough babbling for today I think. Yes, one day I thought I stumbled upon the meaning of life, and that was to find the meaning of life. Maybe that is it. (or part of the quest of being human at least) Or maybe it's to find the meaning in life. But I have a feeling it's more of just being a part of it all. yes? gathering our perspectives? Maybe the "god/all that is" that is trying to get different views of itself (if that is indeed the case) is doing that because it doesn't know either, and isn't any more "in the know" than the rest of us. It is so hard to imagine grander stuff without comparing it to our own existence, isn't it? Is that why we run into so many problems figuring it out, or is it a matter of mirrors and repeating levels? Anyone? Kris Date: Tue, 28 Apr 1998 14:39:30 -0700 Hi: I am delurking to say that my name is Linda. I've been directed (within) to find out what I can about Michael teachings. I can't say that I understand very much about this list and am learning. I had my overleaves channeled recently. I would like to know what book to purchase which explains about the overleaves terms and in general about Michael teachings? I came across several books on the internet, but don't know which one would be a good starter book. Thanks in advance for your help. Peace, Date: Wed, 29 Apr 1998 07:50:40 +0800 At 01:43 AM 4/28/98 -0000, Diane L. S wrote:
>JJ,
Thanks. :-) Well, now that I have my more-complete overleaves channeled by Kenneth Broom, the subject of ET and TC comes up. And according to the info, I am supposed to have contacted both my ET and TC... and I have no idea!! Time to validate...!! Hugs to you too!! ('cause my Reserve Mode prohibits me too much!) Regards. J J Tan Date: Wed, 29 Apr 1998 07:54:23 +0800 At 02:53 AM 4/28/98 -0000, Mike H wrote:
> My personal suspicion of why all that is created this plane is because
Well... we, player of Nintendo, can't change the rules of the games. But we, as creator of this plane, gets to choose and change whichever rules we want. And that's part of the game. :-) J J Tan Date: Wed, 29 Apr 1998 01:14:33 -0700
| From: Kenneth Broom
I guess it makes sense to figure it that way if it's the case that...
| "Greater Cadence" has little meaning within an Entity,
What is meant here is "Greater Cadence position", correct?
| but [Greater Cadence] is a useful means of describing the group of
I was unaware of that.
| ET's and TC's are also part of the Greater Cadence.
It is my understanding that one's ET is in the same casting position in a different Entity within the same Cadre. Mine has been channeled to fit that structure.
| And... each fragment is part of the Greater Cadence of each member of her/his Greater Cadence.
Huh? Isn't that defining something in terms of itself?
| The position numbers seem to be just influences/imprintings acting upon the Essences.
Right.
| Any Essence may occupy any entity position.
That is the current (new) understanding.
| There are other considerations(sic) regarding Entity Organization that
Count on it!
| Just as a reminder: in order for there to be an entity mate relationship
Wouldn't that depend on one's definition of "Entity Mate"? Also, how can two fragments in the same Entity not have identical casting hierarchy up to the Tao?
| Michael suggests that fragments validate their relationships through
To me, "validate" means essentially to confirm. The numbers give us a place to start, something to validate. Cheers, Date: Wed, 29 Apr 1998 01:14:57 -0700
| Hi:
It is probably the case that every student has their favorite book. As you noted, there are several on the market. Probably the most thorough and complete book currently available is »The Journey of Your Soul« by Shepherd Hoodwin. If you go back through the archives of this list you will note instances of students being completely engrossed when they first get the book. It's really quite good. Another one I like is »The World According to Michael« by Joya Pope. It is a much smaller book than »Journey« but gives a good overall view of the teachings. If you go to Shepherd's site at http://www.Summerjoy.com/ you can read some of the chapters in »Journey«. Cheers, Date: Wed, 29 Apr 1998 12:25:06 EDT In a message dated 4/29/98 6:01:53 AM, Ken wrote:
>> Also, how can two fragments in the same Entity not have identical casting hierarchy up to the Tao?
The cadre numbers Michael uses through me are each unique. They do not imply a particular position within a cadre group--they just keep going up, although I've never gotten a number higher than 23, since "birds of a feather flock together." I simply wouldn't have cause to channel a chart for someone very far afield from me. However, the numbers I get can be translated into their positions within cadre groups. Sarah's new system starts with very large groupings, "nodes," and works to the more specific. I don't yet have enough information on it to translate between it and the system Michael uses through me. Best, Date: Wed, 29 Apr 1998 19:02:23 +0000 Hi folks, With regard to tracing your "roots" up to the Tao. I fully agree that at present there's just no way to know if one "Entity 3, Cadre 4" is the same as another "Entity 3, Cadre 4" without further details. Just as there's obviously more than one "apartment 3 on the 4th floor" within a whole city. The address system given so far seems to be just too limited. However, using Sarah C's *node* info, I think I've got a clearer picture of what's going on which can help to narrow things down somewhat. For instance, I'm told that myself, my wife and my sister-in-law are all members of Node 804. As far as I can tell, node number is a specific address system for this planet, a sort of unique zip code for those working on Earth. There isn't any other Node 804 in this neck of the woods! The "node" (or "pod"?) is the highest organizational unit yet identified by Michael. In Sarah C's readings, a node apparently incorporates 343 cadres, which makes 2,401 entities ( or >2.4 million fragments). Also according to Sarah's info [and thanks to Shepherd for passing this on], specific nodes are identified by a somewhat peculiar number system, beginning with Node 100. One factor in this is the species type:- Nodes 100-1xx are human Perhaps Node 100 was the first node on Earth -- the first great wave of souls (2 and a half million of them...) to ensoul the human species. If that's the case, then being in Node 804 puts me way down the list -- nothing wrong with that! However, I don't know if all nodes 100-299 would have incarnated before the first wave of cetaceans (300?), or if it's more a matter of any old node deciding to "go in" when it's good and ready (cetacean node 465 followed by human node 205...). Of course, it doesn't matter in terms of who's in which Node. Looking at it carefully, if every possible 3-figure slot is filled, the above list only accounts for up to 500 nodes of souls incarnating as humans (that's about 0.125 billion fragments) and up to 400 nodes incarnating as cetaceans. There must be more, I reckon, so the list surely goes on beyond Node 999. Exactly how many 'human' nodes there are in action at present is hard to say, but I'd say there must be at least some 2,500 human nodes involved. This will include fragments who currently are doing their thing in the astral locker room between lives, not just those of us running around on the planet wondering who we are. I don't know if any entire nodes have already cycled off the planet. Anyway, coming back to the original point, if we all had our node numbers and greater cadre numbers, we'd all have our unique addresses -- not all the way up to the Tao, but as far as is necessary for planet Earth -- unless you're just a visiting alien of course and need to know your place in the galaxy. Maybe we're ALL in Node 804! BTW, I'm not suggesting that Sarah's got it "right" and all other numbering systems are "wrong"; I'm just following whatever seems to bring me some Scholarly clarity in this great abundance of information, which I love. B a r r y
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 1998 18:49:56 -0500 At 02:53 AM 4/28/98 -0000, Mike wrote:
> > My personal suspicion of why all that is created this plane is because
JJ wrote:
> Well... we, player of Nintendo, can't change the rules of the games. But
Well spoken JJ and I would add that since we "are" the Tao, we are playing in "virtual reality". Love and Laughter :-)) Jeanne Date: Thu, 30 Apr 1998 11:42:09 EDT Hello everyone, I have a question. In the original Messages From Michael, Michael says that the Shroud of Turin is most definitely real. That is, it is the actual cloth that Jesus was wrapped in. Well, within the last decade or so, 4 separate universities simultaneously tested the Shroud using carbon-14 dating and ALL of them found that it only dated from the 13th or 14th century. Therefore, the Shroud is not what the Catholic church claims it to be. I understand Michael sometimes "makes mistakes" but he goes on about the validity of the Shroud in detail for almost a full page. If such a major blatant error is made, how can we be sure that the other claims Michael make are true?
Fromtl Date: Thu, 30 Apr 1998 12:53:08 EDT You think for yourself and you get insite and perspective from Michael. When I can't figure something out or have run out of logical explanations, then I get channeling. To get channeling before one has exhausted self plans of action on any subject could lead to weakness, lack of self confidence and eventually ineptness. I know some very successful people who won't lift a finger without consulting Michael and they do very well. It does not work for me. Michael works best for me when I need an understanding or POV of something I refuse to see. If Michael was right about everything then Michael would be worshipped and Channels would be deified. Michael is no more right than one's own intuition. Channels are no examples of Heroes or Heroines. They need guidance, love and support as much as any of us. Love, support and guide your local channel today. Dan P.S.: The EDD audit went well. Thank you all for your kindness of thoughts. Date: Thu, 30 Apr 1998 16:03:31 -0700 I've got this watch that I like a lot, it's got a green face and in small golden capital letters it says, "NOW" and it always reminds me what time it *really* is, it's now (of course it does tell time too,) an opportunity to seize the moment, or to let it slip by..... Perhaps what would even be better is to have the saying "All Is Chosen" written backwards, tatooed across my forehead so I could see it every time I looked in the mirror! Well, maybe not. ;-p But anyway, knowing that "all is chosen" really gives us a lot of responsibility, and a lot of power. It lets us know that we choose our destiny, and that means we create opportunities, and then act upon them to create what we want, be it happiness, success, or a great sandwich. Totally taking accountability for our lives and what happens in our lives makes us free. Taking responsibility is the only way I know of that totally frees us from Chief Feature. When you are being totally accountable for your life, you do not fear being out of control, that there is lack, that you're not good enough, that you're a victim, that there isn't enough time, that the unknown is a scary thing, etc., that all the Chief Features are based on. When you are totally accountable, you know that you are free to make a new choice, at this very moment. Love,
Accountability
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 98 23:32:11 UT Jeanne wrote: "since we "are" the Tao, we are playing in "virtual reality." Is that why sometimes I get so dizzy . . . ? --------<--{@ Jody Date: Thu, 30 Apr 1998 22:16:49 EDT In a message dated 4/30/98 4:04:31 PM, Fromtl wrote:
Well, within the last decade or so, 4 separate universities simultaneously
I really wonder about the accuracy of carbon dating. Michael has said much of the Egyptian civilization is tens of thousands of years older than the scientists have measured it to be. And in my anthropology classes we heard about wildly different dates as a result of testing. Those stories don't usually make the news. One thing that I did see in the news was the carbon testing may have been done not on the material of the shroud itself, but on some fungi that grew on the shroud many years later. (It coated the threads.) But if it really is the shroud... couldn't they use to to tell us how tall Jesus was? John C Date: Thu, 30 Apr 1998 22:16:16 -0700 (PDT)
> But if it really is the shroud... couldn't they use to to tell us how tall Jesus was?
...It would be neat if an artist could paint him somehow. Mike H Date: Fri, 01 May 1998 02:31:57 -0700
| From: Kenneth Broom
Well I completely missed your point here, and something Barry said in his response clarified it. Duh... Cheers, Date: Fri, 01 May 1998 02:32:23 -0700 Thanks for your posts, Barry. They are always enlightening (from another Scholar's point of view, anyway!). Cheers, Date: Fri, 01 May 1998 23:42:51 +0800 At 11:35 PM 4/30/98 -0000, Jody B wrote:
>Jeanne wrote: "since we "are" the Tao, we are playing in "virtual reality."
No, that might be something to do with inner ear infection. :-) Seriously... well, I sometimes get that dizzy spell, too. And sometimes it feels as if I'm on "remote control"... as if I am not looking through my own eyes, but one step removed (detached?), from a 3rd person perspective. J J Tan Date: Fri, 1 May 1998 12:42:33 -0400 Just some thoughts on infinity, uroboros, etc.....Somehow I think the
physical universe and perhaps the not so physical universes have a structure
that is spheric or cyclic; like we journey in circles.....(an answer to one's
feeling of dizziness :-) and we journey in cycles. Our planet does, and so does
our solar system in our galaxy. --Sharon Date: Fri, 1 May 1998 11:37:26 -0700 I just arrived for the first time at this site last night. I have to say this
is all so very interesting. How do you channel Michael or any other spirit?? I
would really like to know. Please. Someone, anyone?? Help. Peace & Love Date: Sat, 02 May 1998 10:44:03 +0000 Hi all, I'd be interested to hear from anyone who's had experience of teaching the Michael teachings to classes. What format have you used? (Weekly evenings? One-off class? Weekend workshops?) Have you included experiential work, or just delivered the info? How have you attracted people to the classes/groups? There's nothing going on Michael-wise here in the UK, so I may try to get something like this going. All feedback/input welcome. B a r r y Date: Sat, 2 May 1998 09:38:27 EDT Dear Barry -- My feedback on the subject; just a few ideas. I think a sizable fraction of people who discover the Michael books would like to have the further experience of participating in a study group. The subject is so large and it needs to be grounded into actual concrete reality, i.e., actual people with actual soul ages, overleaves and so on. Any group could profitably spend huge amounts of time studying or discussing the teachings and pursuing it all wherever they are led to. Most people also want to get their overleaves and find their essence twins and so on. This generally means getting a session from a channel. IMHO this doesn't need to be part of a study group and a group can get along fine operating on the basis that they want to figure out their overleaves and so on themselves and thrash it out in discussion. If the members know each other this is fun; if they don't it is a slow process. Probably most of the students who would make the effort to attend a group regularly would also get a Michael reading if they have access to a channel. My experience is that the various channels who had regular groups, where people paid money and Michael channeled general info and answered personal questions -- this activity has declined in almost every case. It seems that most individual students will eagerly ask their personal questions up to a certain point, then it begins being expensive and repetitive and they realize that they can and should get their own answers. Actual study groups are not unlike meditation groups (generally, small groups with some spiritual focus that meet regularly) in having a constant conflict between two principles: the more often they meet and the more time they spend together, the better; but most people have all sorts of other demands on their time which make it hard to find a consensus that allows frequent regular meetings. There are other big issues over who can join as new members, about privacy, and other human relations soap opera that can come up; also issues of leadership and politics. If the group is a set of mostly strangers whose main common interest is Michael, the issues above will probably spoil the fun and hold you to a limited, dry, scholarly and intellectual exploration until and unless a lot of personal barriers and defenses come down. On the other hand, if you have a group of people who already are mostly friends or at least know each other, and if you meet frequently and have a common purpose, then you have great potential for positive benefit in many ways; but chances are that this group doesn't have much common interest or knowledge of Michael, and trying to narrow the focus to Michael makes for problems. My general recommendation, and I think Michael might even endorse it, is that there is great positive benefit to be had from small groups meeting with a spiritual (and/or community) focus regularly, preferably weekly. It should include some meditation, holding hands in a circle, etc., so as to reinforce the strengthening of the love and interconnections and support between all the group members. This is basically what early churches were about long ago. The group builds a deep and powerful energy. It follows wherever it "wants to go", including explorations of healing, study of spiritual and metaphysical teachings, and/or leadership and action in the community surrounding. If a group can't find a way to meet weekly I don't think the commitments are strong enough ultimately for it to work well. Many people find the time weekly to have regular parties, or all-night poker games, or to watch movies or sports, or even attend church services, so if they can't find a way to fit in a couple of hours for spiritual group communing, they aren't probably interested enough to make much of it. All the best, Ed Date: Sat, 02 May 1998 08:36:02 -0700 Dora, welcome and here is a suggestion on learning to channel: I took a class on the subject a few years ago which Stephen Cocconi and Holly Coleman teach. blessings, Date: Sat, 2 May 1998 12:22:37 EDT Hi again, I was a member of a Michael group for 12 years before I became a
channel, both in a non-paying status and as a paying student. (different groups)
The paid group met monthly, there were 4-5 of us and we asked personal
questions. This was an extremely worthwhile experience for me as it allowed me
to explore questions and not always have to schedule the more expensive 90
minute sessions. (I did those too when I felt I needed it or had very personal
questions which didnt seem to be best asked in a group) This particular study
group was one of 5 or so that the channel "Camille" from MMFM was hosting. She
also had classes which most of us went to and enjoyed very much. Beyond that, we
would get together socially, and for rituals. I also have been a member of an on-going core Michael group where no money is exchanged and that had an entirely different flavor. Here we asked questions of more general interest, more cutting edge kind of material and new Michael material based on the original teachings, but expanded. I am still a member of that group as well, and enjoy it very much. I think a combination is very practical. Different students are going to have different needs and it good to try to respond to those. Here in Half Moon Bay. we have monthly study groups where there is channeling and talk, a drop- in monthly Michael chat, private sessions, workshops on Michael and related topics and personal sessions. Some people do all of these, some like the classes, some come just for the workshops. Others prefer to join us for non- structured celebratory kinds of gatherings and thats great too. When I was first a Michael student, I asked questions and waited for the answers before I would take action on anything important. Thats changed for me now, because while I still ask the questions, I also trust that I can make god decisions myself. However, I have to say that I always find the overleaves of people fascinating and helpful. More advanced students can work on the figuring them out and then can ask Michael for validation. So Barry, ask people what they need. My guess is that new students are going to want some channeling, and maybe you can combine that with classes etc... best regards, Victoria Marina AMT channel Date: Sat, 2 May 98 10:05:58 -0700
>But if it really is the shroud... couldn't they use to to tell us how tall Jesus was?
The Airforce Academy Chapel ** (Colorado Springs) has a 3d model built by cadets from shroud information. So yes, they can tell how tall and how wide also. (I saw the model last summer but I can't remember quite how tall it was). Yours -- Ted ** there are three sections to the chapel. Level one houses the Jewish and Catholic religion, Level Two, the most elevated and spacious glass triangle holds the Protestants. Date: Sat, 2 May 1998 14:09:56 EDT Hello there- My friend and I having been feeling very strange the past few days. Fatigued and heavy, actually. A friend of hers who channels (not Michael) said that the earth has been undergoing some major energy shifts recently and that our symptoms are linked. Does anyone have anymore info on what has been going on the past few days? Thanks. -Christian Date: Sat, 2 May 1998 15:05:03 -0500 Hi Shepherd and all, Just wanted to pass on what I consider some very nice news. I was at Barnes & Noble today and there on one of the New Age shelves was "The Journey of You Soul" by Shepherd Hoodwin. Did not know that they were stocking it. Since I already have it, I didn't purchase it, but it warmed my heart to see it sitting there. Love and Laughter :-)) Jeanne Date: Sat, 2 May 1998 17:14:05 EDT Dear Christian -- I am not particularly sensitive or psychic, but I have felt positive energy for a long time. I've been following the bulletin boards in AOL on various new age related subjects for a couple of years, and I constantly encounter there and elsewhere people who, possibly in the negative of artisan, create all sorts of great cosmic reasons and explanations for why they have a headache or feel weird. All I can say is that each one is a unique individual having their own experience and creating whatever its meaning is. On a very, very broad level it seems very clear to me that we are experiencing an unprecedented planetray acceleration into love and light. The Hindu cycle of yugas or the Mayan calendar cycle, both of which are based on the 25 or 26000 year cycle of the precession of the equinoxes -- but they disagree as to where we are on the cycle -- give you an idea of what we are approaching, as does the Christian "end times" idea, at least whatever the truth was underneath all the negativity, fear and misunderstanding there. Jesus, who is generally regarded as the source of the Course in Miracles, describes early in that text how we learn so very much more when time collapses (as in a good hug) -- when we manage to escape from our usual focus on our material time and space situation, we can integrate and heal much more efficiently. This is what "At-one-ment" is all about. This is happening, more and more, all over, in a big way, whether or not you believe that or have a theoretical explanation. The reality is that this process is happening, it is accelerating, more and more people understand it and are joining the momentum, and one would be wise to have a realist attitude about it. This is going on and it impacts individuals in a multitude of ways, depending on where you are on your path and what sort of sociocultural surroundings you are in. It is very, very hard on baby souls or others who are heavily imprinted with a baby-soul outlook or fear-based religion, for they feel they should resist or stop these out-of-control changes. I'd say it is best to embrace it with joy. We are all going to have a pretty good chance to be in our own "christ consciousness" state within a few years. Never in history has there been so much positive momentum or acceleration. If you tune into the rate of the acceleration, and the way in which it multiplies as a mass- consciousness phenomenon, it is easy (for me, anyway) to completely rationally, realistically, practically expect that we are going to continue on into unprecedented positive growth and change. It will be much easier to be "in essence" and in positive poles and to live in love and without fear than ever before. My advice then, would be to enjoy the ride and go full speed ahead toward whatever your life's purposes are, and to clear out any old patterns of inappropriate fear based on our historical experience, which is more and more irrelevant with each new day. Whatever is going on with "earth changes", I think that the Creator would very clearly rather have us go through this change and experience growing into it, than to trash the planet and wipe out the human population in a wholesale way, as the doom-and-gloom types would expect. (I feel a certain responsibility to counteract the negativity and fear-mongering that goes on under "earth changes".) If the younger souls are going to be relocated to another planet somewhere to continue their younger soul experience, which seems likely to me, it does not follow that they have to be wiped out wholesale. It works better if they each grow through this amazing time and after this life is over they can decide in the astral plane as cadres (however it all works) whether to stay here in an older-soul earth reality or to move to the new place. Bear in mind we are likely to see the Infinite Soul coming in in some way in the near future, too. It seems reasonable to me that Michael and other channeled entities will not be able to understand the Infinite Soul manifestations or predict them or have any accurate information to reveal. It does seem likely that something awfully cool is coming up, though! All the best, Ed Date: Sat, 2 May 98 18:30:26 -0700
>Hello there-
This may be of help -- Ted Coronal Mass Ejections on the rise. See at: http://hesperia.gsfc.nasa.gov/sftheory/cme.htm "GEOMAGNETIC ACTIVITY IS EXPECTED TO REACH MINOR STORM LEVELS ON 02 MAY IN RESPONSE TO THE ANTICIPATED ARRIVAL OF AN M6/HALO CORONAL MASS EJECTION OBSERVED ON 29 APRIL. CONDITIONS SHOULD RETURN TO UNSETTLED LEVELS BY THE END OF THE FORECAST PERIOD." To see the results of this relatively minor CME and forecasts see: http://www.sel.noaa.gov/today.html Watch the weather as the atmosphere is pumped up by these pulses. See:
http://www.intellicast.com/weather/intl/worldsat/ See current images of the sun. http://umbra.nascom.nasa.gov/eit/eit_full_res.html "As the sun begins to move toward the new solar maximum (predicted to peak around the year 2000) it will naturally become more and more violent and will generate more and more magnetic loops which produce both sunspots and Coronal Mass Ejections {CMEs} which are magnetic loop systems that break away from the sun and frequently travel earthward."
To learn more about CMEs and what they might mean to earth dwellers check out: http://www.teleport.com/~singtech/wrath.html Date: Sun, 03 May 1998 12:13:16 +0800 Barry wrote on 2/5/98 9:48 am:
>Hi all,
That should be something interesting to do in Singapore. But with several
obstacles: As it is, I consider myself lucky that I managed to introduce Michael's Teaching to a colleague without getting strange looks. :-) J J Tan Date: Sun, 03 May 1998 01:07:36 -0700 Hi Ed,
| Bear in mind we are likely to see the Infinite Soul coming in in some
Can you elaborate on the last part? I don't understand why it should be as you state. Thanks, Date: Sun, 3 May 1998 08:50:46 EDT Dear Dick -- What I was getting at was that in comparison with the Infinite Soul, if we are babes, Michael and other channeled entities are little kids. We can try to predict the infinite activities based on past experience and so can Michael, but the Infinite isn't mechanical or predictable, except perhaps in its own terms at the Infinite level, and that's not anything we or Michael will figure out any time soon. Further, the Infinite seems to go right at whatever we are most ignorant of and blind to. All the best, Ed Date: Sun, 3 May 1998 18:10:11 -0500 Hi Everyone, Have corresponded with Lori and Barry and I wanted to let you all know that we have a choice of what type of newsletter we would like to have. We can either have a straight forward subscribtion newsletter or we can have a Michael Students Website "newsletter". The Website Newsletter would contain a FAQ page for Newbies, a once a month/quarter (whatever) newsletter, archived previous newsletters and Links. This could be by password only or could be open to anyone who cared to come and look at it. Barry suggested that if we do the website type we could e-mail everyone when a new issue was on the site. What I would like to know is what all of you prefer. I know that some of you never post to the list but I would really appreciate your input this time. To avoid traffic on the Michael List, please e-mail me and let me know what your preferences are. This will be for all of us and all of us should indicate our choice. I'm asking you to think about it and let me know by the first of June. Then I'll post the results on the Michael List. I won't ask any of you to contribute if you don't want to, but I would really like to know your feelings about "style". Thanks very much. As the Michaels say "Choices". Love and Laughter :-)) Jeanne 5th Level Old Sage/Priest ET;Discrimination;
Michael Teachings Home | Welcome | Michael FAQ | Soul Age | Roles | Overleaves | Advanced Topics | The Nine Needs | Michael Channeling | Related Articles | Channels & Resources | Michael Tools | Michael Books | Michael Chat | Michael Student Database | Links | |
SUMMARY:
Another year begins on the list.
Next Page | 1998/17
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |