From where is Seth speaking?
THIS ENTITY SPEAKS FROM THE CAUSAL PLANE. THE BIAS THROUGH WHICH HE IS SPEAKING LESSENS NOW. (The medium’s bias is lessening.)
During hypnosis, someone asked the question, “Is the power in the present moment?” This was in relation to material he had read in the newest Seth book.
YOU SEE, THERE IS TRULY A POWER IN THE PRESENT MOMENT, BUT IT CAN ONLY BE FELT WHEN THAT MOMENT IS EXPANDED TO INCLUDE ALL THAT YOU HAVE BEEN AND ALL THAT YOU ARE NOW. IF YOU ARE ERECTING AND MAINTAINING BARRIERS AGAINST PAST PAIN, THEN HOW ARE YOU GOING TO DO THIS? WHEN TWO SOULS MEET AGAIN, AND THERE IS RECOGNITION, THIS CAN BE A POWERFULLY POSITIVE EXPERIENCE, IF IT IS FELT BY BOTH. IT CAN ALSO BE SCARY, AS IT WAS FOR THIS MAN, BECAUSE HIS BELIEF SYSTEM DOES NOT GO BEYOND THE GRAVE. PLEASE KNOW THAT BELIEF SYSTEMS PERMEATE ALL LOWER CENTERS IN THEIR CONTROL. ALTHOUGH THIS MAN CAN INTELLECTUALLY RATIONALIZE ON ALTERNATIVES, THIS INTELLECT EVENTUALLY COMES TO REJECT THESE ALTERNATIVES, AS THE BELIEF SYSTEM DOES NOT ALLOW THEM ROOM. IT IS LIKE THE MOUNTAINS OF EVIDENCE VERSUS THE SHRED OF PROOF OF WHICH YOU HAVE ALL SPOKEN BEFORE. YOU WILL CLING TO THE SHRED OF NON-PROOF TENACIOUSLY AS LONG AS THE BELIEF SYSTEM IS IN CONTROL.
Could Michael clarify a confusion I have about time, time frames, and physical existence? I get from Michael that we cannot coexist in two separate time frames simultaneously. Seth says that we can, and calls this “reincarnational dramas”. Is this the “pan-dimensional”, or close to it?
YOUR OWN FRAGMENTS OF YOUR OWN ENTITY DO NOT EVER CROSS THE TIME FRAMES, AS THIS WOULD BE THE ANTITHESIS OF PROGRESS, OR IN SOME INSTANCES, PROPULSION INTO A FAR FUTURE TO WHICH YOU COULD NOT ADJUST. HOWEVER, WHEN YOU CHOSE AN ALTERNATIVE COURSE FROM THE MANY ALTERNATIVES, YOU ACTED THIS OUT. THE OTHER ALTERNATIVES ARE ALSO ACTED OUT IN OTHER TIME FRAMES. FOR INSTANCE, IN A TIME FRAME DAG HAMERSKJOLD WILL NOT GET ON THAT PLANE; IN STILL ANOTHER, HE WILL, BUT IT WILL NOT CRASH; IN STILL ANOTHER, HE WILL BE ASSASSINATED. CROSSING THE TIME FRAMES SERVES NO PURPOSE, ONLY SLOWS THE GROWTH. IT IS POSSIBLE TO SEE OPTIONS OPEN TO YOU. THIS CAN BE THEN LOOKED UPON AS VIEWING ALL THE POSSIBLE TIME FRAMES, AND, OF COURSE, IS AVAILABLE TO YOU AS A VERY REAL SEGMENT OF THE PANDIMENSIONAL UNIVERSE. A REVERSE OR REPETITIVE CYCLE WOULD BE AN ANTITHESIS OF THE NATURAL ORDER, AND WOULD ONLY BE CREATED IN THE MIND OF A MECHANICAL MAN INTENT UPON HIS COMFORTABLE BELIEF SYSTEM THAT REJECTS ORDER.
Are the essences similar, parallel to this one?
Is there an analogy Michael could give us to clarify this?
A “DOPPELGANGER” [ghost of a living person] PERHAPS WOULD BE DESCRIPTIVE. THE ESSENCES ARE QUITE SEPARATE, AS THEY EXIST IN A PARALLEL TIME FRAME, BUT EXCEPT FOR THE DIFFERING ALTERNATIVE CHOICES, THEY ARE IDENTICAL. THESE ARE THE LIVES YOU DID NOT LEAD. AN ANALOGY, OF COURSE, WOULD BE THREE TRAVELERS COMING TO A THREE-WAY FORK IN A ROAD, EACH CHOOSING TO TAKE DIFFERENT FORKS, ALL OF THE TRAVELERS POSSESSING IDENTICAL OVERLEAVES AND SIMILAR IMPRINTING. THE CHOICE WOULD THEN INCLUDE ALL OF THE EXPERIENCES ALONG THE ROAD THEY HAVE CHOSEN.
SOURCE: Michael Teachings Transcripts
-- SETH'S NINE FAMILIES OF CONSCIOUSNESS
Q. Seth has described 9 families of consciousness that exist in the universe. Is there any terminology in the Michael Teachings that would describe these families? For example, are these families actually cadres, entities, or maybe roles?
SETH'S 9 FAMILIES OF CONSCIOUSNESS: Gramada - to found social systems; Sumafi - to transmit originality through teachings; Tumold - to heal, regardless of individual occupation; Vold - to reform the status quo; Milumet - to mystically nourish mankind's psyche; Zuli - to serve as physical, athletic models; Boreledim - to provide earth stock for species via parenthood; Ilda - to spread and exchange ideas; Sumari - to provide cultural, spiritual, & artistic heritage for species.
MICHAEL: These families of consciousness are not attached to particular souls but provide a way to delineate foci for series of lifetimes for individual fragments. For example, you might have a series of four lifetimes focusing on reforming some aspect of society; you would then be drawing on a discrete consciousness called "Vold" here.
CHANNELED BY: Shepherd Hoodwin