Home> Michael Teachings
is the next Overleaf?
WOULD PREFER NOT [to say], ESPECIALLY WITH SO
MANY NEW PEOPLE.
was hard for me to leave _____’s group, and I
never understood why,
but I had to leave. Is there a comment here
WAS NOT YOUR [true] TEACHER, AND AT ANOTHER
LEVEL YOU KNEW THIS, AND
LEFT TO SEARCH AGAIN.
was he not my teacher?
WAS NOT SUFFICIENT POLAR ATTRACTION.
this have to do with Bodytypes or what?
TAKES INTO CONSIDERATION ALL OF THE
Warriors and Scholars conflict?
THIS IS ONE OF THE GREATEST AFFINITIES.
would like to ask for comments about the film,
The Exorcist. I
did not see it, but I have been reading about
it in the paper. It
seems to be an ugly film, and it is attracting
many crowds who faint
or become ill.
STORY IS, OF COURSE, CONSUMMATELY ABSURD. AS
WE HAVE TOLD YOU
REPEATEDLY, THE DEMONS CONJURED UP ON THE
PHYSICAL PLANE ARE OF YOUR
OWN CREATION. IF BELIEF IN THE EXORCIST’S
SKILL IS GREAT ENOUGH,
THE DRAGONS CAN BE SLAYED IN THIS WAY. THIS IS
AN ANCIENT SKILL, NOW
MUCH ABUSED. JESUS OF COURSE HAD THIS SKILL
EVEN BEFORE THE
MANIFESTATION [of the Infinite Soul], BUT HE
ALSO REALIZED THAT THE
DEMONS WERE SELF-INFLICTED. MOST OCCULT
MASTERS WILLINGLY EXORCISED,
BUT THEY DO TRY TO MAKE THE AFFLICTED ONE
REALIZE THAT THE DEMONS
WERE CREATED OUT OF ETHERIC MATERIAL, AND HAVE
NO PLACE IN THE
CONCRETE REALITY OF THE PHYSICAL PLANE. MOST
TO BABY SOULS IN REJECTION.
have heard it said that when Christ was born
He was a reincarnation
said in the Bible that He was Elias [Elijah]
IS ALSO VALID. JOHN [The Baptist?] AND JESUS
WERE BOTH FRAGMENTS OF
THE SAME ANCIENT ENTITY. AT THE TIME OF THEIR
INCARNATION, ALL THE FRAGMENTS HAD REUNITED.
THIS WAS AN ENTITY
COMPOSED OF FIVE HUNDRED PRIESTS AND FIVE
told us to study Epicurus, for a reason that
Christ was much
influenced by him. The problem I have here is
that from what I read
about Epicurus, he believed the soul and the
body were one and
inseparable, and there is no reincarnation.
SAID THAT JESUS WAS HEAVILY INFLUENCED BY
EPICURUS. HE WAS. EPICURUS
WAS NOT A MANIFESTATION [of a Transcendental
or Infinite Soul]; HE
WAS A MATURE PRIEST. THE HUMANITARIAN ASPECTS
OF HIS PHILOSOPHY ARE
WORTH EMULATING. THIS, BY THE WAY, IS TYPICAL
OF GREEK THOUGHT OF
THAT PERIOD. JESUS KNEW ABOUT REINCARNATION
THROUGH THE MYSTICAL
TEACHINGS OF THE ESSENES IN THE HILLS AROUND
THE TOWN IN WHICH HE WAS
BORN. AS AN OLD SOUL, THIS MAN WENT THROUGH
ALL OF THE CONFUSION AND
DOUBTS THAT SOME OF YOU ARE NOW EXPERIENCING,
THE DIFFERENCE BEING
THAT HE WAS ABLE TO SORT IT OUT. THE GREEK
PHILOSOPHERS WISHED TO
NEGATE THE CHARM OF THE “OTHER WORLD” SO THAT
THIS WORLD WOULD
HAVE MORE MEANING. THEY, OF COURSE, SUCCEEDED
NOT AT ALL, BUT THE
GENTLENESS OF EPICUREAN THOUGHT PERSISTED
THROUGH THE AGES PRIMARILY
BECAUSE OF THE SEPARATION FROM THE AFFAIRS OF
STATE, WHICH IS VALID.
THIS SEPARATION MUST BE MADE BEFORE FURTHER
GROWTH CAN ENSUE.
would like to ask for comment about a lady who
did a psychic reading
THERE WAS CONSIDERABLE DRAMA THERE. THIS LADY
IS A MATURE SAGE.
DOES NOT EMBELLISH AS MUCH AS SHE DRAMATIZES.
THERE IS A DIFFERENCE.
would like to hear something about the
teachings of Jesus in relation
to divorce: He was always so harsh.
QUESTION OF DIVORCE IS A TRAGIC ONE ONLY IN
YOUR CULTURE, AS
RELATIVELY LITTLE THOUGHT IS GIVEN TO THE
SUITABILITY OF THE PAIR
BONDING INITIALLY. ASSIGNING ALL OF THIS TO
NONSENSE. WE ARE SURPRISED ONLY THAT MORE PAIR
BONDS CONTRACTED IN
THIS HAPHAZARD MANNER DO NOT DISSOLVE. JESUS
WAS COGNIZANT OF THIS.
THERE WAS SOME PERSONAL BIAS HERE THAT CAME
OUT IN THIS MAN [Jesus],
AS THE MARRIAGE BETWEEN HIS MOTHER AND FATHER
WAS DOTTED WITH
INTERFERENCE FROM HIS MOTHER’S FAMILY. HIS
FATHER’S ONLY RECOURSE
WAS TO THREATEN REGULARLY DIVORCE WHEN HE
COULD NO LONGER STAND THE
PRESSURE EXERTED BY AN OBNOXIOUS
BROTHER-IN-LAW. JESUS GREW UP WITH
THIS HANGING OVER HIS HEAD.
IS A FIFTH LEVEL YOUNG ARTISAN IN GROWTH, A
EMOTIONALLY CENTERED. SHE WAS FIRST BORN TO
S.G. THIS IS THE TIE THAT
MOST TENUOUSLY BINDS THEM TOGETHER. THAT WAS
DURING THE PEAK OF THE
Jesus’ prejudiced ideas of divorce were
attributed to his early
childhood, how does Michael form their ideas
to set down values and
judgments of divorce.
FRAGMENTS OF THIS ENTITY (Michael), AT THE
TIME THEY WERE ON THE
PHYSICAL PLANE, RAN THE GAMUT OF OPINION
CULMINATING IN THE OPINION
THAT ACCEPTANCE OF ALL OTHER SOULS IN THE FORM
OF AGAPE WAS THE
GREATEST TRUTH. THIS DID NOT OCCUR UNTIL THE
WAS COMPLETED. THE INTERPERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS
INDUCED BY YOUR
CULTURE ARE SUPERFICIAL, AND ARE FOR THE MOST
PART TO BE CONDEMNED IN
TEACHINGS SUCH AS THIS. THE STUDENTS [of such
teachings] OFTEN GROW
TO THE POINT WHERE THE RELATIONSHIPS TRANSCEND
AND TRULY BECOME SPIRITUAL BONDING, OR PSYCHIC
UNION — WHICH IS
WHAT JESUS WAS TALKING ABOUT. HE ATTEMPTED TO
RELATIONSHIPS BASED UPON EROTIC LOVE,
ESPECIALLY AMONG THOSE CLOSE TO
has been said that “people” on the astral
plane have access to
the high mental plane. Does Michael have
access to the high mental
THAT IS VALID.
there were psychic union, there would be no
divorce: is that so?
UNION IS CONTRACTED ON OTHER THAN THE PHYSICAL
that type of union happen at different soul
THIS USUALLY DOES NOT HAPPEN AT ALL UNTIL THE
FINAL LIFE CYCLE [old
soul age], IF AT ALL. SPIRITUAL GROWTH CAN, OF
COURSE, HAPPEN AT
EARLIER LEVELS, BUT YOUR CULTURE THWARTS IT.
this culture always thwart it?
there problems when Baby souls marry Older
SOULS HAVE HAD RELATIVELY UNCOMPLICATED
RELATIONSHIPS WITH BABY
SOULS, BUT USUALLY ONLY WHEN THE BABY [soul]
it be better for a marriage relationship to
have the persons in
different Centers of gravity? I understand
that my husband and I are
both Intellectually Centered. Is this a source
of our problems?
IN THE SAME CENTER OF GRAVITY USUALLY MAKES
FOR AN EASIER
RELATIONSHIP RATHER THAN A MORE DIFFICULT ONE.
YOUR PROBLEMS ARE IN
THE DIFFERENCE IN GOALS [Growth versus
would like to ask, if there is no such thing
as possession by devils,
what the devil it was that happened to the
family in Daly City where
knives were thrown into the wall by no
apparent human, pieces of
chicken were thrown around, etc., and the
Catholic priest “exorcised
the demons” away for these people.
WAS NOT A POSSESSION; THIS WAS A HABITATION
ETHERIC VEHICLES OF NEWLY DEAD [people did
these particular people? Is it karmic? Is it
was] NOT NECESSARILY [karmic]. THE[re was an]
ERROR IN THIS CASE,
YES. (The etheric vehicle was) FROM A
these people have any choice?
THEY CONTRIBUTED TO THE STRENGTH OF THE
MANIFESTATION THROUGH THEIR
etheric spirit has no power of its own, and I
have heard that it
borrows energy from people, or pets, and does
is supposed to make the etheric vehicle
disappear. Michael could
remove it. It is only there for a limited
time. It is the etheric
aura which remains in graveyards of the
freshly buried. People have
seen skeletons in the graveyard.
we have a comment on what the priest did and
how he did it?
PRIEST WAS ABLE TO PSYCHICALLY REUNITE THE
ETHERIC FRAGMENT WITH THE
ASTRAL VEHICLE SO THAT IT COULD DECOMPOSE
NORMALLY ON THE ASTRAL
PLANE. THIS [deceased person] WAS A BABY SOUL
WITH A STRONG
ATTACHMENT TO THE PHYSICAL PLANE.
is why it is good to pray for the soul to go
in the proper direction
when someone dies.
assume then that the words the priest said did
THEY DID NOT, BUT WHAT HE DID PSYCHICALLY DID.
HAD HE BEEN SILENT, HE
WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ABLE TO CONVINCE THE
INHABITED [haunted] ONES
THAT ANYTHING HAD BEEN DONE, AND THEY WOULD
HAVE RECREATED THEIR
the priest aware of what he is doing
psychically? Do all priests know
how to exorcise?
THE JESUITS. PLEASE MAKE THAT DISTINCTION.
THIS MAN IS AWARE.
do not understand Michael when they say that
demons and hell are
absurd. What do they say about the three
temptations of Christ where
He said, “Get thee behind me, Satan”? He drove
the demons out of
THE WORD “MAYA” FOR THE WORD “SATAN”. WE DID
NOT SAY THAT
HELL, DEMONS, AND THE LIKE WERE ABSURD, MERELY
OF YOUR OWN CREATION.
THEY ARE VERY REAL TO THOSE WHO MUST ENDURE
THEM. WHERE THE RUB COMES
IS THAT YOU NEED NOT ENDURE THEM.
“devil” then can be said to be a product of
Personality. It is the physical body fighting
is the carnal mind that keeps one from seeing
Monroe, in his book on the out-of-body
experiences, described several
monster-like creatures on his neck. These are
demons in between
lives, Baby Souls who cannot stand the loss of
the physical. Why does
Christ threaten hell fire and brimstone and
casting into outer
darkness? Why does He say there will be much
gnashing of teeth (all
the money spent on orthodontia, too)?
DID NOT THREATEN ANYONE WITH VIOLENCE OF HIS
OWN MAKING. HE MERELY
POINTED OUT TO THEM WHAT WAS IN STORE FOR THEM
IF THEY CONTINUED TO
PURSUE THE COURSE THEY WERE ON. ONE OF THE
GROUPS HIT THE HARDEST WAS
THE PHARISEES, WHO HAD EXTREMELY LITERAL AND
UNSHAKABLE BELIEFS IN A
PERSONAL, LIVING GOD. THIS WAS NOT THE EASIEST
GROUP TO CHALLENGE,
BUT THEY DID UNDERSTAND THREATS. THE
SADDUCEES, ON THE OTHER HAND,
WERE ALREADY SKEPTICAL AND MORE WILLING TO
GIVE UP THE
PERSONIFICATION, BUT WERE NOT WILLING TO GO TO
BATTLE FOR THEIR
BELIEFS. THE JEWISH WORLD BY THAT TIME WAS
SPLIT WIDE OPEN AT THAT
TIME BY THE OPPOSING FACTIONS. THE SADDUCEES
LIKED THE HELLENISTIC
INFLUENCES AND LIKED MUCH ABOUT THE ROMAN
DOMINION: BESIDES THEY HAD
NO DESIRE TO ROCK THE BOAT. THE PHARISEES,
ALTHOUGH CERTAINLY NOT AS
OPPOSED AS THE ZEALOTS AND THE ESSENES, DID
RESENT THE MERE PRESENCE
OF OUTSIDERS IN THEIR MIDST. THEY FELT
RITUALLY UNCLEAN FROM THE
DAILY CONTACT WITH UNCIRCUMCISED HEATHENS, AND
FOR THEM, THE PRESENCE
OF SO MANY OUTSIDERS WAS AN ANNOYANCE AND THEY
RESENTED IT. THEY ALSO
CONSIDERED IT A BAD INFLUENCE ON WOMEN AND
YOUNG CHILDREN. ROMAN
LADIES OFTEN ACCOMPANIED THEIR HUSBANDS INTO
BATTLE AND TO THE
FIRST WHEN THIS YOUNG MAN [Jesus] BEGAN HIS
ACTIVE RABBINATE, THAT
WAS BEFORE THE MANIFESTATION [of the Infinite
Soul]. HE EXPERIENCED
MANY FRIGHTENING VISIONS OF HIS OWN CREATION.
THE MAN LUCANUS
QUIRINUS [Luke] CONDENSED ABOUT TEN YEARS [of
Jesus' ministry] INTO
old was Christ when He left His body?
WAS BORN SIX YEARS BEFORE THE COMMON ERA.
(Christ was born six years
before Christ!). HE DIED MARCH SEVENTEENTH IN
THE THIRTY-THIRD YEAR
OF THE COMMON ERA. (So He was 39.) [Jesus was
said to have been
crucified at the time of the Jewish Passover,
bit it never happens
this early in the year -- before the equinox.]
we aren’t supposed to be judgmental, why was
it that Christ seemed
so judgmental? I realize it is symbolic when
He says, “Don’t cast
pearls before swine”. I sort of resent that He
judges some people
is like saying, “Don’t give meat to babies”
because they are
not ready to digest it yet.
MAN JESUS WAS SUBJECT TO ALL THE HUMAN
JUDGMENTAL TENDENCIES. THE INFINITE SOUL WAS
can we tell what is from Jesus and what is the
TEACHING [from us] SHOULD ENABLE YOU TO
did He cry? Was it because of what He saw in
the future for people?
INFINITE SOUL IS NOT BEREFT OF EMOTION. IT WAS
seems that I am going from the Young soul to
the Mature Level because
of a great change in how I perceive people. I
see them so much more
differently than a while back. Can you
WOULD PREFER THAT YOU CONTINUALLY OBSERVE YOUR
CHANGES AND DECIDE FOR
it a universal desire to be in another’s head
(as Jane Fonda once
said that was what she would like most of
IS THE DESIRE OF MOST SOULS IN [the Goal of]
get the feeling that one should not be hung up
in the literal
translation of the New Testament. Do you have
to drop the literal
IT CERTAINLY IS NOT PROFANE, WE SUPPOSE THAT
ONE COULD CALL THIS WORK
[the Bible] “SACRED”. WE WOULD PREFER
“INSPIRED”, AS MUCH OF
IT CAME DOWN THROUGH CENTURIES OF ORAL
TRADITION. MUCH OF THE OLD
TESTAMENT IS POETRY AND MYSTICAL. THIS CANNOT
BE TAKEN LITERALLY. THE
MAN, JOHN [author of the “Revelation”, not the
apostle], WAS A
WITNESS OF THAT WHICH HE ATTEMPTED TO
DESCRIBE. HE WAS AN EMOTIONALLY
CENTERED YOUNG SCHOLAR. THE MAN, PETER, WAS
WHICH WAS A SHAME, FOR HE UNDERSTOOD MORE THAN
HE COULD COMMUNICATE.
JOHN WAS SUBJECT TO VISIONS.
seemed the most judgmental and bitter.
CONCEPT OF BITTERNESS IN MATTHEW IS VALID. HE
HAD AN AX TO GRIND, AND
ALTHOUGH HE TRIED DESPERATELY TO PURGE HIS
BIAS, IT DID SPILL OUT AT
TIMES. HE WAS CRUELLY TREATED IN THE COUNTRY
OF HIS BIRTH.
do not have one grain of faith in the Bible
other than [as] a
teaching. I am happy to borrow from Buddhism.
There are too many
obscure things in the Bible. What I have for
myself I have verified
step by step without faith.
WE CALL “INTUITION”, SOME [Christians] CALL
would like to hear Michael’s definition of
WHICH IS BORN OF ESSENCE AND IS DEVOID OF MAYA
does Michael say about a seminary community?
Is it spiritual?
[members] OF THEM ARE. SOME HAVE NO INKLING OF
ANYTHING BEYOND THE
PHYSICAL PLANE, BUT ARE DRAWN TO THE CLERGY
BECAUSE IT IS A NICE
THING TO DO.
IS NOT INTUITION EITHER; THAT IS PRECOGNITION.
expect something like the “Baptism of the Holy
Ghost”. How can I
reach what I want?
HAVE SUGGESTED TO YOU SEVERAL WAYS THAT SHOULD
HELP YOU FIND WHAT YOU
SEEK. WHY DON’T YOU TRY AT LEAST ONE OR THE
is giving us the how: the synthesis!
here] ACCEPT US AS THEIR TEACHER. THIS IS NOT
NECESSARILY THE TRUTH
FOR [others here].
the soul levels are the same and both are
aiming for the truth, (and
I believe we all have the truth within us),
does the soul Levels see
the truth differently?
ALSO THE ROLES DICTATE SOME DIFFERENCE IN
APPROACH TO THE TRUTH.
Bodytypes have personality traits? The group
to Michael Teachings
Michael Teachings Home | Site Map | Welcome |
Introduction | Michael FAQ |
Soul Age | Roles |
Advanced Topics |
Nine Needs |
Michael Channeling |
Related Articles | Channels & Resources |
Michael Tools | Michael Books | Michael Chat |
Michael Student Database |
Role Photos |
Spiritweb List Archives |
Glossary | Links | About Dave